[PATCH 2/5] perf/sdt/x86: Add renaming logic for rNN and other registers
From: Ravi Bangoria
Date: Thu Feb 02 2017 - 06:13:07 EST
'perf probe' is failing for sdt markers whose arguments has rNN
(with postfix b/w/d), %rsp, %esp, %sil etc. registers. Add renaming
logic for these registers.
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
index 09a7f55..d8a8dcf 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -48,10 +48,42 @@ static const struct sdt_name_reg sdt_reg_renamings[] = {
SDT_NAME_REG(rdx, dx),
SDT_NAME_REG(esi, si),
SDT_NAME_REG(rsi, si),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(sil, si),
SDT_NAME_REG(edi, di),
SDT_NAME_REG(rdi, di),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(dil, di),
SDT_NAME_REG(ebp, bp),
SDT_NAME_REG(rbp, bp),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(bpl, bp),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(rsp, sp),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(esp, sp),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(spl, sp),
+
+ /* rNN registers */
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r8b, r8),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r8w, r8),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r8d, r8),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r9b, r9),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r9w, r9),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r9d, r9),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r10b, r10),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r10w, r10),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r10d, r10),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r11b, r11),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r11w, r11),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r11d, r11),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r12b, r12),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r12w, r12),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r12d, r12),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r13b, r13),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r13w, r13),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r13d, r13),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r14b, r14),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r14w, r14),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r14d, r14),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r15b, r15),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r15w, r15),
+ SDT_NAME_REG(r15d, r15),
SDT_NAME_REG_END,
};
@@ -88,18 +120,6 @@ int sdt_rename_register(char **pdesc, char *old_name)
/* Copy the chars after the register name (if need be) */
offset = prefix_len + sdt_len;
- if (offset < old_desc_len) {
- /*
- * The orginal register name can be suffixed by 'b',
- * 'w' or 'd' to indicate its size; so, we need to
- * skip this char if we met one.
- */
- char sfx = old_desc[offset];
-
- if (sfx == 'b' || sfx == 'w' || sfx == 'd')
- offset++;
- }
-
if (offset < old_desc_len)
memcpy(new_desc + prefix_len + uprobe_len,
old_desc + offset, old_desc_len - offset);
--
2.9.3