Re: [PATCH V11 3/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver

[Agustin Vega-Frias]

Hi Andy,

On 2017-01-25 19:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Agustin Vega-Frias
> <agustinv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Driver for interrupt combiners in the Top-level Control and Status
> > Registers (TCSR) hardware block in Qualcomm Technologies chips.
> >
> > An interrupt combiner in this block combines a set of interrupts by
> > OR'ing the individual interrupt signals into a summary interrupt
> > signal routed to a parent interrupt controller, and provides read-
> > only, 32-bit registers to query the status of individual interrupts.
> > The status bit for IRQ n is bit (n % 32) within register (n / 32)
> > of the given combiner. Thus, each combiner can be described as a set
> > of register offsets and the number of IRQs managed.
>
> > +static inline u32 irq_register(int irq)
> > +{
> > +       return irq / REG_SIZE;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u32 irq_bit(int irq)
> > +{
> > +       return irq % REG_SIZE;
> > +
> > +}
>
> Besides extra line I do not see a benefit of those helpers. On first
> glance they even increase characters to type.

Will remove these.

> > +static inline int irq_nr(u32 reg, u32 bit)
> > +{
> > +       return reg * REG_SIZE + bit;
> > +}
>
> This one might make sense.
>
> > +static void combiner_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > +       struct combiner *combiner = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > +       struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > +       u32 reg;
> > +
> > +       chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> > +
> > +       for (reg = 0; reg < combiner->nregs; reg++) {
> > +               int virq;
> > +               int hwirq;
> > +               u32 bit;
> > +               u32 status;
> > +
> > +               bit = readl_relaxed(combiner->regs[reg].addr);
> > +               status = bit & combiner->regs[reg].enabled;
> > +               if (!status)
> > +                       pr_warn_ratelimited("Unexpected IRQ on CPU%d: 
> > (%08x %08lx %p)\n",
> > +                                           smp_processor_id(), bit,
> > +                                           
> > combiner->regs[reg].enabled,
> > +                                           combiner->regs[reg].addr);
> > +
>
> > +               while (status) {
> > +                       bit = __ffs(status);
> > +                       status &= ~(1 << bit);
>
> Interesting way of for_each_set_bit() ?

I'm leaving this as-is since in arm64 using __ffs can be optimized
better by using the bic instruction.

> > +                       hwirq = irq_nr(reg, bit);
> > +                       virq = irq_find_mapping(combiner->domain, 
> > hwirq);
> > +                       if (virq > 0)
> > +                               generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > +
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> > +}
> > +
>
> > +/*
> > + * irqchip callbacks
> > + */
>
> Useless.

Will remove

> > +/*
> > + * irq_domain_ops callbacks
> > + */
>
> Ditto.

Will remove

> > +/*
> > + * Device probing
> > + */
>
> Ditto.

Will remove

> > +static acpi_status count_registers_cb(struct acpi_resource *ares, 
> > void *context)
> > +{
> > +       int *count = context;
>
> I would consider to define a struct. It would be easy to extend if 
> needed and...

The intent here is always to get the count so I don't see value
in adding the struct.

> > +
> > +       if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GENERIC_REGISTER)
> > +               ++(*count);
>
> ...allows not to use such of constructions. (I think above is
> equivalent to ++*count).

IMHO having the parentheses makes the code clearer.

> > +       return AE_OK;
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int count_registers(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +       struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
>
> You don't use adev, so, ACPI_HANDLE() ?

Will change

> > +       acpi_status status;
> > +       int count = 0;
> > +
> > +       if (!acpi_has_method(adev->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       status = acpi_walk_resources(adev->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
> > +                                    count_registers_cb, &count);
> > +       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       return count;
> > +}
>
> Oh, since you are using this just as a helper to get count first, why
> not to combine this in one callback?
> What's the benefit of separation?

This is because we do an allocation based on the count first.

> > +
> > +struct get_registers_context {
> > +       struct device *dev;
> > +       struct combiner *combiner;
> > +       int err;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static acpi_status get_registers_cb(struct acpi_resource *ares, void 
> > *context)
> > +{
> > +       struct get_registers_context *ctx = context;
> > +       struct acpi_resource_generic_register *reg;
> > +       phys_addr_t paddr;
> > +       void __iomem *vaddr;
> > +
> > +       if (ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GENERIC_REGISTER)
> > +               return AE_OK;
> > +
> > +       reg = &ares->data.generic_reg;
> > +       paddr = reg->address;
> > +       if ((reg->space_id != ACPI_SPACE_MEM) ||
> > +           (reg->bit_offset != 0) ||
> > +           (reg->bit_width > REG_SIZE)) {
> > +               dev_err(ctx->dev, "Bad register resource @%pa\n", 
> > &paddr);
> > +               ctx->err = -EINVAL;
> > +               return AE_ERROR;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       vaddr = devm_ioremap(ctx->dev, reg->address, REG_SIZE);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
> > +               dev_err(ctx->dev, "Can't map register @%pa\n", 
> > &paddr);
> > +               ctx->err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
> > +               return AE_ERROR;
> > +       }
>
> This all sounds to me like an OperationalRegion. But I'm not sure it's
> suitable here.
> Do you have ACPI table carved in stone?

I decided to go with registers because in some cases these might be non-
contiguous.

> > +
> > +       ctx->combiner->regs[ctx->combiner->nregs].addr = vaddr;
> > +       ctx->combiner->nirqs += reg->bit_width;
> > +       ctx->combiner->nregs++;
> > +       return AE_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int get_registers(struct platform_device *pdev, struct 
> > combiner *comb)
> > +{
> > +       struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
> > +       acpi_status status;
> > +       struct get_registers_context ctx;
> > +
> > +       if (!acpi_has_method(adev->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       ctx.dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +       ctx.combiner = comb;
> > +       ctx.err = 0;
> > +
> > +       status = acpi_walk_resources(adev->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
> > +                                    get_registers_cb, &ctx);
> > +       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > +               return ctx.err;
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init combiner_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +       struct combiner *combiner;
> > +       size_t alloc_sz;
> > +       u32 nregs;
> > +       int err;
> > +
> > +       nregs = count_registers(pdev);
> > +       if (nregs <= 0) {
> > +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error reading register 
> > resources\n");
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       alloc_sz = sizeof(*combiner) + sizeof(struct combiner_reg) * 
> > nregs;
> > +       combiner = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, alloc_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       if (!combiner)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +       err = get_registers(pdev, combiner);
> > +       if (err < 0)
> > +               return err;
> > +
> > +       combiner->parent_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +       if (combiner->parent_irq <= 0) {
> > +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error getting IRQ resource\n");
> > +               return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       combiner->domain = irq_domain_create_linear(pdev->dev.fwnode, 
> > combiner->nirqs,
> > +                                                   &domain_ops, 
> > combiner);
> > +       if (!combiner->domain)
> > +               /* Errors printed by irq_domain_create_linear */
> > +               return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +       irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(combiner->parent_irq,
> > +                                        combiner_handle_irq, 
> > combiner);
> > +
> > +       dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Initialized with [p=%d,n=%d,r=%p]\n",
> > +                combiner->parent_irq, combiner->nirqs, 
> > combiner->regs[0].addr);
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id qcom_irq_combiner_ids[] 
> > __dsdt_irqchip = {
> > +       { "QCOM80B1", },
> > +       { }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver qcom_irq_combiner_probe = {
> > +       .driver = {
> > +               .name = "qcom-irq-combiner",
>
> > +               .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> Do you still need this?

Will remove

Thanks,
Agustin

> > +               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(qcom_irq_combiner_ids),
> > +       },
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. on behalf of the Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a 
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.