Re: [PATCH 10/60] staging: lustre: obdclass: add more info to sysfs version string

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Feb 03 2017 - 05:33:06 EST


On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:04:38PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> From: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Update the sysfs "version" file to print "lustre: " with
> the version number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5969
> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/16721
> Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> index 9f5e829..22e6d1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ struct miscdevice obd_psdev = {
> static ssize_t version_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> - return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", LUSTRE_VERSION_STRING);
> + return sprintf(buf, "lustre: %s\n", LUSTRE_VERSION_STRING);
> }

Why? You "know" this is lustre, why say it again? Doesn't this affect
userspace tools?

thanks,

greg k-h