Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: add another missing end_page_writeback on submit_extent_page failure

From: takafumi-sslab
Date: Sat Feb 04 2017 - 07:42:45 EST



(But it could be changed after subpagesize block patchset, and there is
more work rather than just adding a end_page_writeback, e.g. writepage
endio also needs to be updated).

Ok... the discussion become complicated.
So, let me make this clear.

you think
a) this is a bug;
we need to clear the writeback bit in the error handling if the bit remains.

b) however, the way of fixing this bug has some concerns.ã( and now we discuss the best solution )

Is my understanding correct?

Sincerely,

-takafumi

Thanks,

-liubo
Sincerely,

On 2017/01/31 5:09, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:12:31PM +0900, takafumi-sslab wrote:
Thanks for your replying.

I understand this bug is more complicated than I expected.
I classify error cases under submit_extent_page() below

A: ENOMEM error at btrfs_bio_alloc() in submit_extent_page()
I first assumed this case and sent the mail.
When bio_ret is NULL, submit_extent_page() calls btrfs_bio_alloc().
Then, btrfs_bio_alloc() may fail and submit_extent_page() returns -ENOMEM.
In this case, bio_endio() is not called and the page's writeback bit
remains.
So, there is a need to call end_page_writeback() in the error handling.

B: errors under submit_one_bio() of submit_extent_page()
Errors that occur under submit_one_bio() handles at bio_endio(), and
bio_endio() would call end_page_writeback().

Therefore, as you mentioned in the last mail, simply adding
end_page_writeback() like my last email and commit 55e3bd2e0c2e1 can
conflict in the case of B.
To avoid such conflict, one easy solution is adding PageWriteback() check
too.

How do you think of this solution?
(sorry for the late reply.)

I think its caller, "__extent_writepage", has covered the above case
by setting page writeback again.

Thanks,

-liubo
Sincerely,

On 2016/12/22 15:20, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:41:50PM +0900, Takafumi Kubota wrote:
This is actually inspired by Filipe's patch(55e3bd2e0c2e1).

When submit_extent_page() in __extent_writepage_io() fails,
Btrfs misses clearing a writeback bit of the failed page.
This causes the false under-writeback page.
Then, another sync task hangs in filemap_fdatawait_range(),
because it waits the false under-writeback page.

CPU0 CPU1

__extent_writepage_io()
ret = submit_extent_page() // fail

if (ret)
SetPageError(page)
// miss clearing the writeback bit

sync()
...
filemap_fdatawait_range()
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
// wait the false under-writeback page

Signed-off-by: Takafumi Kubota <takafumi.kubota1012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 1e67723..ef9793b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3443,8 +3443,10 @@ static noinline_for_stack int __extent_writepage_io(struct inode *inode,
bdev->bio, max_nr,
end_bio_extent_writepage,
0, 0, 0, false);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
SetPageError(page);
+ end_page_writeback(page);
+ }
OK...this could be complex as we don't know which part in
submit_extent_page gets the error, if the page has been added into bio
and bio_end would call end_page_writepage(page) as well, so whichever
comes later, the BUG() in end_page_writeback() would complain.

Looks like commit 55e3bd2e0c2e1 also has the same problem although I
gave it my reviewed-by.

Thanks,

-liubo

cur = cur + iosize;
pg_offset += iosize;
--
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Keio University
System Software Laboratory
Takafumi Kubota
takafumi.kubota1012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
Keio University
System Software Laboratory
Takafumi Kubota
takafumi.kubota1012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
Keio University
System Software Laboratory
Takafumi Kubota
takafumi.kubota1012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx