Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: handle unknow of_device_id data

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sun Feb 05 2017 - 04:32:11 EST


On 04/02/17 21:47, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/04/2017 10:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2017 06:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
>>>> index 0c44f72c32a8..331ff9a673be 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
>>>> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static int rcar_gyroadc_parse_subdevs(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>>>> struct device_node *child;
>>>> struct regulator *vref;
>>>> unsigned int reg;
>>>> - unsigned int adcmode, childmode;
>>>> + unsigned int adcmode = -1, childmode;
>>>> unsigned int sample_width;
>>>> unsigned int num_channels;
>>>> int ret, first = 1;
>>>> @@ -366,6 +366,9 @@ static int rcar_gyroadc_parse_subdevs(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>>>> channels = rcar_gyroadc_iio_channels_3;
>>>> num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_gyroadc_iio_channels_3);
>>>> break;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "unknown device type");
>>>
>>> Is this verbose output really needed ?
>>
>> I don't care much either way, I was just trying to follow what the function does
>> for the other failure cases. We can probably drop it though, as this
>> would indicate
>> a bug in the driver implementation, while the others are about
>> incorrect DT data.
>
> I don't really want to pester you too much with minor details, let's
> wait for JIC's opinion. If you're resending, please add my Ack,
> otherwise consider this patch:
>
> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx>
>
I've applied with the dev_err dropped. Didn't care that much either
way :)

Anyhow, applied to the fixes-togreg-post-rc1 branch of iio.git as
I might not get another pull request out pre the merge window.
(if I do I'll apply it with that).

Thanks,

Jonathan