Re: [PATCH 3.10 275/319] ipc: remove use of seq_printf return value

From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Mon Feb 06 2017 - 03:07:26 EST

Next message: Vincent Guittot: "Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix the nohz.next_balance update mess"
Previous message: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [PATCH 3.10 280/319] locking: Remove atomicy checks from {READ,WRITE}_ONCE"
In reply to: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [PATCH 3.10 275/319] ipc: remove use of seq_printf return value"
Next in thread: Willy Tarreau: "[PATCH 3.10 246/319] brcmfmac: avoid potential stack overflow in brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:21:37PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> commit 7f032d6ef6154868a2a5d5f6b2c3f8587292196c upstream.

Dropped as not needed anymore by the ipc/sem fix.

Willy

Next message: Vincent Guittot: "Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix the nohz.next_balance update mess"
Previous message: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [PATCH 3.10 280/319] locking: Remove atomicy checks from {READ,WRITE}_ONCE"
In reply to: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [PATCH 3.10 275/319] ipc: remove use of seq_printf return value"
Next in thread: Willy Tarreau: "[PATCH 3.10 246/319] brcmfmac: avoid potential stack overflow in brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]