Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: pciehp: Don't enable PME on runtime suspend

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Feb 06 2017 - 07:01:46 EST


On Monday, February 06, 2017 06:54:37 AM Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Since commit 68db9bc81436 ("PCI: pciehp: Add runtime PM support for PCIe
> hotplug ports") we runtime suspend a hotplug port to D3hot when all its
> children are runtime suspended or none are present.
>
> When runtime suspending the port the PCI core automatically enables PME:
> pci_pm_runtime_suspend()
> pci_finish_runtime_suspend()
> __pci_enable_wake()
>
> According to the PCI Express Base Specification, section 6.7.3.4:
> "Note that PME and Hot-Plug Event interrupts (when both are
> implemented) always share the same MSI or MSI-X vector [...]
> If wake generation is required by the associated form factor
> specification, a hot-plug capable Downstream Port must support
> generation of a wakeup event (using the PME mechanism) on hotplug
> events that occur when the system is in a sleep state or the Port
> is in device state D1, D2, or D3Hot."
>
> Thus, if the port is runtime suspended even though it is still occupied,
> it may immediately be woken by a PME interrupt. One scenario where this
> happens is if all children of the hotplug port have runtime suspended.
> Another scenario is power control via sysfs: If a user manually turns
> the hotplug port off (e.g. to safely remove the card), PME will signal
> an interrupt for the still-occupied slot, which is interpreted by pciehp
> as re-insertion of a card. As a result, power control via sysfs is no
> longer possible. This was observed and reported by Yinghai Lu.
>
> PME is in fact unnecessary on hotplug ports: Hotplug can be signaled
> even in D3hot, and commit 68db9bc81436 ensures that all parents of the
> hotplug port are kept awake so that interrupts can be delivered.
> PME would allow us to runtime suspend the parent ports as well, but we
> do not make use of it because we cannot be sure if PME actually works.
> Thunderbolt controllers for instance advertise PME capability, but at
> least on Macs the PME pin is not connected.
>
> Since we do not rely on PME for hotplug ports, we may as well not enable
> it, thereby avoiding its negative side effects. However the present
> commit deliberately only avoids enabling PME on runtime suspend, the
> ability to enable it for system sleep is retained.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193951
> Fixes: 68db9bc81436 ("PCI: pciehp: Add runtime PM support for PCIe
> hotplug ports")
> Reported-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v1-> v2:
> Move check for is_hotplug_bridge from pci_finish_runtime_suspend()
> down into pci_dev_run_wake(), this seems cleaner, less clumsy.

ACK

>
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index a881c0d..9c22e62 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2096,6 +2096,14 @@ bool pci_dev_run_wake(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct pci_bus *bus = dev->bus;
>
> + /*
> + * Don't enable PME at runtime on hotplug ports (even if supported)
> + * since PME sends unwanted interrupts if the slot is occupied while
> + * suspended to D3hot (PCIe Base Specification, section 6.7.3.4).
> + */
> + if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge)
> + return false;
> +
> if (device_run_wake(&dev->dev))
> return true;

Thanks,
Rafael