Re: [PATCH net-next v1 6/7] bpf: Use the bpf_load_program() from the library

[MickaÃl SalaÃn]

On 06/02/2017 23:44, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 02/06/2017 10:30 PM, MickaÃl SalaÃn wrote:
>> On 06/02/2017 20:18, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 02/06/2017 08:16 PM, MickaÃl SalaÃn wrote:
>>>> On 06/02/2017 16:30, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>>> On 02/06/2017 12:14 AM, MickaÃl SalaÃn wrote:
>>>>>> Replace bpf_prog_load() with bpf_load_program() calls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Use the tools include directory instead of the installed one to allow
>>>>>> builds from other kernels.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: MickaÃl SalaÃn <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        |  6 +++++-
>>>>>>     tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_sys.h       | 21
>>>>>> ---------------------
>>>>>>     tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c      |  6 ++++--
>>>>>>     tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c |  8 +++++---
>>>>>>     4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> No objections, but if so, can't we add the remaining missing
>>>>> pieces to bpf lib, so we can remove bpf_sys.h altogether?
>>>>
>>>> OK, I'll send a new patch replacing bpf_sys.h entirely.
>>>
>>> Sounds great, thanks!
>>
>> Do you prefer a big patch or one for each replaced function?
> 
> I think it makes sense to split it into two: i) this patch as-is
> for the prog part, and ii) rest for maps.
> 

Hum, I already split them to ease the review. I'm going to send this
series now.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature