Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: preparatory changes for APICv cleanups
From: Radim KrÄmÃÅ
Date: Tue Feb 07 2017 - 13:20:55 EST
2016-12-19 17:17+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> Add return value to __kvm_apic_update_irr/kvm_apic_update_irr.
> Move vmx_sync_pir_to_irr around.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Radim KrÄmÃÅ <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 5fa546e27b7e..4c76c602576e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int find_highest_vector(void *bitmap)
> vec >= 0; vec -= APIC_VECTORS_PER_REG) {
> reg = bitmap + REG_POS(vec);
> if (*reg)
> - return fls(*reg) - 1 + vec;
> + return __fls(*reg) + vec;
> }
>
> return -1;
> @@ -361,27 +361,36 @@ static u8 count_vectors(void *bitmap)
> return count;
> }
>
> -void __kvm_apic_update_irr(u32 *pir, void *regs)
> +int __kvm_apic_update_irr(u32 *pir, void *regs)
> {
> - u32 i, pir_val;
> + u32 i, vec;
> + u32 pir_val, irr_val;
> + int max_irr = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; i <= 7; i++) {
> + for (i = vec = 0; i <= 7; i++, vec += 32) {
> pir_val = READ_ONCE(pir[i]);
> + irr_val = *((u32 *)(regs + APIC_IRR + i * 0x10));
> if (pir_val) {
> - pir_val = xchg(&pir[i], 0);
> - *((u32 *)(regs + APIC_IRR + i * 0x10)) |= pir_val;
> + irr_val |= xchg(&pir[i], 0);
> + *((u32 *)(regs + APIC_IRR + i * 0x10)) = irr_val;
> }
> + if (irr_val)
> + max_irr = __fls(irr_val) + vec;
> }
> +
> + return max_irr;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_apic_update_irr);
>
> -void kvm_apic_update_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *pir)
> +int kvm_apic_update_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *pir)
> {
> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> + int max_irr;
>
> - __kvm_apic_update_irr(pir, apic->regs);
> + max_irr = __kvm_apic_update_irr(pir, apic->regs);
>
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> + return max_irr;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_apic_update_irr);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> index 5b5b1ba644cb..8aa54fdc43d1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ int kvm_lapic_reg_read(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 offset, int len,
> bool kvm_apic_match_dest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic *source,
> int short_hand, unsigned int dest, int dest_mode);
>
> -void __kvm_apic_update_irr(u32 *pir, void *regs);
> -void kvm_apic_update_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *pir);
> +int __kvm_apic_update_irr(u32 *pir, void *regs);
> +int kvm_apic_update_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *pir);
> void kvm_apic_update_ppr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_apic_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq,
> struct dest_map *dest_map);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 661956caf162..eab8ab023705 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -5068,22 +5068,6 @@ static void vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
> kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> }
>
> -static void vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> -
> - if (!pi_test_on(&vmx->pi_desc))
> - return;
> -
> - pi_clear_on(&vmx->pi_desc);
> - /*
> - * IOMMU can write to PIR.ON, so the barrier matters even on UP.
> - * But on x86 this is just a compiler barrier anyway.
> - */
> - smp_mb__after_atomic();
> - kvm_apic_update_irr(vcpu, vmx->pi_desc.pir);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Set up the vmcs's constant host-state fields, i.e., host-state fields that
> * will not change in the lifetime of the guest.
> @@ -8750,6 +8734,22 @@ static void vmx_hwapic_irr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int max_irr)
> }
> }
>
> +static void vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> +
> + if (!pi_test_on(&vmx->pi_desc))
> + return;
> +
> + pi_clear_on(&vmx->pi_desc);
> + /*
> + * IOMMU can write to PIR.ON, so the barrier matters even on UP.
> + * But on x86 this is just a compiler barrier anyway.
> + */
> + smp_mb__after_atomic();
> + kvm_apic_update_irr(vcpu, vmx->pi_desc.pir);
> +}
> +
> static void vmx_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap)
> {
> if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html