Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses
From: Boris Ostrovsky
Date: Tue Feb 07 2017 - 17:38:51 EST
On 02/07/2017 12:51 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 11:23 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 24/01/17 14:47, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 01/23/2017 01:59 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> On 01/23/2017 05:09 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>> Handling of multiple concurrent Xenstore accesses through xenbus driver
>>>>> either from the kernel or user land is rather lame today: xenbus is
>>>>> capable to have one access active only at one point of time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> This patch appears to break save/restore:
>> Hmm, tried multiple times, but I can't reproduce this issue.
>>
>> Anything special in the setup? I tried a 64 bit pv guest and did
>> "xl save".
>>
>> Do I have to run some load in parallel?
> Any luck reproducing this? I am still failing the test on dumpdata but I
> couldn't reproduce it on another system.
The problem appears to be xs_state_users being non-zero when we call
xs_suspend_enter().
>From what I understand this is caused by xs_request_exit() not
decrementing it when closing a transaction. This seems to be happening
when XS_TRANSACTION_END transaction returns XS_ERROR (I haven't traced
what causes this error but it doesn't appear to cause any visible harm).
Does the patch below make sense?
diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c
index e62cb09..ffd5fac 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ void xs_request_exit(struct xb_req_data *req)
spin_lock(&xs_state_lock);
xs_state_users--;
if ((req->type == XS_TRANSACTION_START && req->msg.type ==
XS_ERROR) ||
- req->msg.type == XS_TRANSACTION_END)
+ req->type == XS_TRANSACTION_END)
xs_state_users--;
spin_unlock(&xs_state_lock);
I ran a few tests on dumpdata and they completed successfully. I'll keep
this for the overnight runs too, with a different Xen version.
-boris