Re: [PATCH 06/11] iommu: Add iommu_device_set_fwnode() interface

From: Robin Murphy
Date: Fri Feb 10 2017 - 09:18:31 EST


On 09/02/17 11:32, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
>
> Allow to store a fwnode in 'struct iommu_device';
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/iommu.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index bae3cfc..626c935 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {
> struct iommu_device {
> struct list_head list;
> const struct iommu_ops *ops;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> struct device dev;
> };
>
> @@ -233,6 +234,12 @@ static inline void iommu_device_set_ops(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> iommu->ops = ops;
> }
>
> +static inline void iommu_device_set_fwnode(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +{
> + iommu->fwnode = fwnode;
> +}

Would it make sense to simply make the ops and fwnode additional
arguments to iommu_device_register() (permitting fwnode to be NULL)?
AFAICS they should typically all have the same effective lifetime so
there doesn't seem to be any real need to handle everything separately.

Robin.

> +
> #define IOMMU_GROUP_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE 1 /* Device added */
> #define IOMMU_GROUP_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE 2 /* Pre Device removed */
> #define IOMMU_GROUP_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER 3 /* Pre Driver bind */
> @@ -580,6 +587,11 @@ static inline void iommu_device_set_ops(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> {
> }
>
> +static inline void iommu_device_set_fwnode(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static inline void iommu_device_unregister(struct iommu_device *iommu)
> {
> }
>