Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix susp/resume
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Date: Fri Feb 10 2017 - 20:16:55 EST
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:05:07PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 02/09/2017 07:45 PM, David Miller wrote:
> >From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:54:24 +0200
> >>On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:21:26PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> >>>From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 02:07:34 +0200
> >>>>These two patches fix suspend/resume chain.
> >>>Patch 2 doesn't apply cleanly to the 'net' tree, please
> >>>respin this series.
> >>Strange, I've just checked it on net-next/master, it was applied w/o any
> >It makes no sense to test "net-next" when I am telling you that it is
> >the "net" tree it doesn't apply to.
> >This is a bug fix, so it should be targetting the "net" tree.
> Looks like the first fix is for net, but the second one is for net-next
> I do not see
> "net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: don't duplicate ndev_running"
> in net.
There is dependency, both for net-next and only first is for net tree