Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 4.10 set 3 - a couple of regression fixes.

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Feb 11 2017 - 04:17:37 EST

On 11/02/17 07:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:35:35PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:35:02AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>> The following changes since commit 5c113b5e0082e90d2e1c7b12e96a7b8cf0623e27:
>>>> iio: dht11: Use usleep_range instead of msleep for start signal (2017-01-22 13:35:40 +0000)
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>> git:// tags/iio-fixes-for-4.10c
>>> It's a bit late for 4.10 for me, can I just pull this into my -next
>>> branch and will they get to 4.10.1 properly? Meaning, do that have cc:
>>> stable markings on them? Or do you want to fix that up and resend this
>>> request?
>> Hi Greg,
>> You should ask Ken Lin who has the HW and who is apparently affected.
>> I think it's bad that you are willing to have a known regression hit
>> v4.10 when all was fine in v4.9. Or perhaps you didn't realize that
>> the regression was from this cycle?
>> The fixes are obvious. I don't understand your hesitation.
> My "hesitation" is that I'm about to get on a plane for a day or so and
> don't have the time to get this to Linus before 4.10-final is out this
> Sunday. Getting it in a week later should be ok, we all make mistakes,
> as long as we fix them it's all good, and for 4.10.1 should be ok.
Who knows, maybe Linus will delay another week anyway ;) Wasn't looking
that clear when I sent these out.

>From my point of view, sure 4.10.1 should be fine. I'll put stable CCs
on them. Will send the pull out shortly so I don't forget about them.

Pull request clearly now becomes first set of fixes for 4.11.

> thanks,
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at