Re: [patch net-next] net: qcom/emac: fix a sizeof() typo

[Timur Tabi]

walter harms wrote:
> We have a function where the argument is ignored and the rest is const ?
>
> emac_ethtool_get_regs_len seems the only user. So it would be fairly easy to
> move that into that function.
>
> @maintainer:
> Is there a deeper logic behind this ?

I don't understand the question.

The patch is valid (I have no idea how I made that mistake).

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.