Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] dmaengine: pl330: Don't require irq-safe runtime PM

[Marek Szyprowski]

Hi Vinod,


On 2017-02-13 16:47, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Although, I don't know of other examples, besides the runtime PM use
> > > > case, where non-atomic channel prepare/unprepare would make sense. Do
> > > > you?
> > > The primary ask for that has been to enable runtime_pm for drivers. It's not
> > > a new ask, but we somehow haven't gotten around to do it.
> > Okay, I see.
> >
> > > > > As I said earlier, if we want to solve that problem a better idea is to
> > > > > actually split the prepare as we discussed in [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > This way we can get a non atomic descriptor allocate/prepare and release.
> > > > > Yes we need to redesign the APIs to solve this, but if you guys are up for
> > > > > it, I think we can do it and avoid any further round abouts :)
> > > > Adding/re-designing dma APIs is a viable option to solve the runtime PM case.
> > > >
> > > > Changes would be needed for all related dma client drivers as well,
> > > > although if that's what we need to do - let's do it.
> > > Yes, but do bear in mind that some cases do need atomic prepare. The primary
> > > cases for DMA had that in mind and also submitting next transaction from the
> > > callback (tasklet) context, so that won't go away.
> > >
> > > It would help in other cases where clients know that they will not be in
> > > atomic context so we provide additional non-atomic "allocation" followed by
> > > prepare, so that drivers can split the work among these and people can do
> > > runtime_pm and other things..
> > That for sharing the details.
> >
> > It seems like some dma expert really need to be heavily involved if we
> > ever are going to complete this work. :-)
> Sure, I will help out :)
>
> If anyone of you are in Portland next week, then we can discuss these f2f. I
> will try taking a stab at the new API design next week.

I'm not going to Portland, but I hope that you will have a fruitful 
discussion
there.

[...]

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland