[for-next][PATCH 4/8] tracing/hwlat: Update old comment about migration

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxx>

The ftrace hwlat does support a cpumask.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170213122517.6e211955@xxxxxxxxxx

Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
index 775569ec50d0..bf209d2657ab 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
@@ -322,10 +322,7 @@ static void move_to_next_cpu(void)
  * need to ensure nothing else might be running (and thus preempting).
  * Obviously this should never be used in production environments.
  *
- * Currently this runs on which ever CPU it was scheduled on, but most
- * real-world hardware latency situations occur across several CPUs,
- * but we might later generalize this if we find there are any actualy
- * systems with alternate SMI delivery or other hardware latencies.
+ * Executes one loop interaction on each CPU in tracing_cpumask sysfs file.
  */
 static int kthread_fn(void *data)
 {
-- 
2.10.2