Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit
From: Timur Tabi
Date: Wed Feb 15 2017 - 09:05:53 EST
Christopher Covington wrote:
Nothing needs QDF2400 erratum 44. Software should try to detect the presence
of the erratum. So I think qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present would
make sense. But those suffixes don't add substantial value in my opinion.
I'd be okay with qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present. I think it's a
lot clearer. Another idea is "has_qdf2400_e44".
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.