Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit

[Timur Tabi]

Christopher Covington wrote:
> Nothing needs QDF2400 erratum 44. Software should try to detect the presence
> of the erratum. So I think qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present would
> make sense. But those suffixes don't add substantial value in my opinion.

I'd be okay with qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present.  I think it's a 
lot clearer.  Another idea is "has_qdf2400_e44".

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.