Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: dwc3: use BIT() macro where possible

From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Thu Feb 16 2017 - 03:55:21 EST



Hi,

Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> writes:
> On 15/02/17 13:44, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> writes:
>>> To avoid checkpatch warnings with new patches let's
>>> start using the BIT() macro wherever possible.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c | 48 +++++------
>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h | 20 ++---
>>> 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>> index 14b7602..d514dca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
>>> #define DWC3_DEVICE_EVENT_OVERFLOW 11
>>>
>>> #define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_MASK 0xfffc
>>> -#define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_EHB (1 << 31)
>>> +#define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_EHB BIT(31)
>>
>> don't you need to include <linux/bitops.h> for this?
>>
>
> I didn't get any build errors though.

indirect inclusion. Problems will show up only when headers are moved
around ;-)

--
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature