Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: davinci: add pdata-quirks for da850-evm vpif display

From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Fri Feb 17 2017 - 08:34:46 EST


2017-02-17 14:15 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx>:
> On Thursday 16 February 2017 11:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> Similarly to vpif capture: we need to register the vpif display driver
>> and the corresponding adv7343 encoder in pdata-quirks as the DT
>> support is not complete - there isn't currently a way to define the
>> output_routing in the V4L2 drivers (c.f. s_routing) via DT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c
>> index 3ca773f..c659c76 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c
>
>> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VIDEO_DAVINCI_VPIF_CAPTURE) */
>>
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DA850_UI_SD_VIDEO_PORT)
>> +static struct adv7343_platform_data adv7343_pdata = {
>> + .mode_config = {
>> + .dac = { 1, 1, 1 },
>> + },
>> + .sd_config = {
>> + .sd_dac_out = { 1 },
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct vpif_subdev_info da850_vpif_subdev[] = {
>> + {
>> + .name = "adv7343",
>> + .board_info = {
>> + I2C_BOARD_INFO("adv7343", 0x2a),
>> + .platform_data = &adv7343_pdata,
>> + },
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct vpif_output da850_ch0_outputs[] = {
>> + {
>> + .output = {
>> + .index = 0,
>> + .name = "Composite",
>> + .type = V4L2_OUTPUT_TYPE_ANALOG,
>> + .capabilities = V4L2_OUT_CAP_STD,
>> + .std = V4L2_STD_ALL,
>> + },
>> + .subdev_name = "adv7343",
>> + .output_route = ADV7343_COMPOSITE_ID,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .output = {
>> + .index = 1,
>> + .name = "S-Video",
>> + .type = V4L2_OUTPUT_TYPE_ANALOG,
>> + .capabilities = V4L2_OUT_CAP_STD,
>> + .std = V4L2_STD_ALL,
>> + },
>> + .subdev_name = "adv7343",
>> + .output_route = ADV7343_SVIDEO_ID,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct vpif_display_config da850_vpif_display_config = {
>> + .subdevinfo = da850_vpif_subdev,
>> + .subdev_count = ARRAY_SIZE(da850_vpif_subdev),
>> + .chan_config[0] = {
>> + .outputs = da850_ch0_outputs,
>> + .output_count = ARRAY_SIZE(da850_ch0_outputs),
>> + },
>> + .card_name = "DA850/OMAP-L138 Video Display",
>> +};
>> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_DA850_UI_SD_VIDEO_PORT) */
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VIDEO_DAVINCI_VPIF_CAPTURE) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DA850_UI_SD_VIDEO_PORT)
>> static void __init da850_vpif_legacy_init(void)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> @@ -119,8 +178,16 @@ static void __init da850_vpif_legacy_init(void)
>> if (ret)
>> pr_warn("%s: VPIF capture setup failed: %d\n",
>> __func__, ret);
>> +
>> + /* LCDK doesn't support VPIF display */
>> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,da850-evm")) {
>> + ret = da850_register_vpif_display(&da850_vpif_display_config);
>
> This fails to build when CONFIG_DA850_UI_SD_VIDEO_PORT is switched off.
> Probably means you need separate functions for registering capture and
> display parts.
>
> I haven't reviewed rest of the patchset yet. Just noticed these while
> applying them for some testing. You may want to wait sometime before
> sending the next version.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>

Eek! My bad, didn't test different configs with that.

Thanks,
Bartosz