Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Don't return -EBUSY when msg->size is 0 in aux transaction

[Tomasz Figa]

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Zain Wang <wzz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> å 2017/2/20 10:40, Tomasz Figa åé:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:27 PM, zain wang <wzz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>>> index 303083a..5384aca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>>> @@ -1162,5 +1162,5 @@ ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct
>>> analogix_dp_device *dp,
>>>                   (msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) == DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ)
>>>                  msg->reply = DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK;
>>>
>>> -       return num_transferred > 0 ? num_transferred : -EBUSY;
>>> +       return (num_transferred == msg->size) ? num_transferred : -EBUSY;
>>
>> I might be missing something but, looking at the code, I don't see any
>> possibility of num_transferred ever being different than msg->size. To
>> be honest, it doesn't seem to even make any sense keeping the local
>> variable there, because msg->size can be simply always returned, as
>> errors are handled by jumping to aux_error label.
>
> Yeah, I agree with you.
> The better way to fix this issue is to revert the changes
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411711/
> (returning num_transferred directly may be better here)

I think it's still not enough to clean up the code completely. It
should be just enough to remove num_transferred completely and simply
return msg->size at the end.

Best regards,
Tomasz