9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration
From:
Mike Galbraith
Date:
Wed Feb 22 2017 - 07:57:23 EST
Next message:
Luc Van Oostenryck: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: traps: Mark __le16, __le32, __user variables properly"
Previous message:
Bartosz Golaszewski: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: davinci: vpif capture & display support"
Next in thread:
Peter Zijlstra: "Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Hi,
Do we really need a spinlock for that in the idle loop?
-Mike
Next message:
Luc Van Oostenryck: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: traps: Mark __le16, __le32, __user variables properly"
Previous message:
Bartosz Golaszewski: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: davinci: vpif capture & display support"
Next in thread:
Peter Zijlstra: "Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]