Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the atmel_nand driver

[Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt]

Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
>> >> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:  
>> >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
>> >> > <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    
>> >> >> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:    
>> 
>> <snipp>
>> 
>> >> >> If nobody complains about the 4.10 breakage, You'll have plenty of time
>> >> >> to remove it for 4.12    
>> >> > 
>> >> > I'm fine with that, but I haven't put much effort into keeping it
>> >> > alive lately. If Hans-Christian agrees, I'm willing to post a patch to
>> >> > remove it, or ack someone else's patch.    
>> >> 
>> >> Then lets plan this for 4.12, either you Håvard whip up a patch or I can
>> >> eventually do it.
>> >> 
>> >> I can push it through the linux-avr32 git tree on kernel.org.
>> >>   
>> > 
>> > Can you do that just after 4.11-rc1 is released and provide a topic
>> > branch I can pull in my nand/next branch, so that I can rework this
>> > patch and drop all the pdata-compat code (as suggested by Andy).  
>> 
>> OK, I will try to prepare it during the weekend.
>> 
>> Any reason to wait for 4.11-rc1? AFAIK Linus prefers the larger changes
>> before he starts tagging rc's.
>> 
> 
> Oh, so you want to queue it for 4.11, that's even better.

Perhaps I misunderstood you, by after 4.11-rc1 you mean queue it for 4.12?

I will see what I get around to do in the weekend, it should be pretty
straightforward, just want to make sure we remove all the bits.

-- 
mvh
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt