Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] On inode::i_count and the usage vs reference count issue

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Fri Feb 24 2017 - 11:43:47 EST

Next message: Masami Hiramatsu: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf: probe: generalize probe event file open routine"
Previous message: Fabrice Gasnier: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: stm32-adc: add option to set resolution"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH 00/10] On inode::i_count and the usage vs reference count issue"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] On inode::i_count and the usage vs reference count issue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Usage counts are common and useful, so for now they should stay as-is
and if people can came up with a useful primitive for them we can
consider implementing it.

Trying to shoe-horn everything into refcount_t is a horrible idea.

Next message: Masami Hiramatsu: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf: probe: generalize probe event file open routine"
Previous message: Fabrice Gasnier: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: stm32-adc: add option to set resolution"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH 00/10] On inode::i_count and the usage vs reference count issue"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] On inode::i_count and the usage vs reference count issue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]