Re: gcc7 log2 compile issues in kernel/time/timekeeping.c

[Markus Trippelsdorf]

On 2017.02.25 at 09:11 +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 25 February 2017 at 08:18, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Why not simply get rid of the ____ilog2_NaN thing altogether?
> >
> 
> That would remove the issue, sure. But we lose an opportunity to spot
> incorrect code at compile time.

In the case of kernel/time/timekeeping.c it is clearly a false positive.
Was ever incorrect code spotted by ____ilog2_NaN in the past?

> My concern is that it by not pushing back on changes to the semantics
> of __builtin_constant_p() such as this one, we may start seeing other
> issues where we can no longer use it, and we lose a very useful tool.

We had a long discussion in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
As you can see there is no real consensus.
But ilog2 seems to be the only place where this ever popped up.
(There were several distro-wide mass rebuilds with gcc-7 and no other
__builtin_constant_p() issue was found yet.)

-- 
Markus