Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t

From: Martin K. Petersen
Date: Mon Feb 27 2017 - 22:14:48 EST

Next message: Shuah Khan: "[PATCH] arm: exynos increase CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES to 96"
Previous message: Martin K. Petersen: "Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use div_u64 for 64-bit division"
In reply to: Arnd Bergmann: "[PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t"
Next in thread: James Smart: "Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "Arnd" == Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:

Arnd> dma_addr_t may be either u32 or u64, depending on the kernel
Arnd> configuration, and we get a warning for the 32-bit case:

Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.

--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

Next message: Shuah Khan: "[PATCH] arm: exynos increase CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES to 96"
Previous message: Martin K. Petersen: "Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use div_u64 for 64-bit division"
In reply to: Arnd Bergmann: "[PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t"
Next in thread: James Smart: "Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]