Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm: dts: imx: Add iMX6Q-based Kontron SMARC-sAMX6i module

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Tue Feb 28 2017 - 18:22:45 EST


On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:06:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Priit Laes <plaes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > SMARC-sAMX6i is a SMARC (Smart Mobility Architecture) compliant
> > module.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Priit Laes <plaes@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 434 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..e3d7a35
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,434 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2017 Priit Laes <plaes@xxxxxxxxx>
> > + *
> > + * Based on initial work by Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko at dev.rtsoft.ru>
> > + *
> > + * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
> > + * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
> > + * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
> > + * whole.
> > + *
> > + * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
> > + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > + *
> > + * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > + *
> > + * Or, alternatively,
> > + *
> > + * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> > + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
> > + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
> > + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
> > + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
> > + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> > + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
> > + * conditions:
> > + *
> > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> > + * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> > + *
> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> > + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
> > + * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> > + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
> > + * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
> > + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> > + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
> > + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
>
> Use SPDX tags here:
>
> SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>
> While it says X11, this is really MIT license text.

No. Read the FSF's page on licenses:

X11 License (#X11License)
...
This license is sometimes called the MIT license, but that term is
misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software.

Never use the term "MIT license", it's ambiguous, and I doubt that such
a term (given the above) would stand up in a court of law as identifying
any particular license.

--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.