Re: [PATCH v2] lockdep: Teach lockdep about memalloc_noio_save
From: Vlastimil Babka
Date: Wed Mar 01 2017 - 05:25:09 EST
On 03/01/2017 11:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:57:13AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1.03.2017 11:46, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:59:00AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>> Commit 21caf2fc1931 ("mm: teach mm by current context info to not do I/O
>>>> during memory allocation") added the memalloc_noio_(save|restore) functions
>>>> to enable people to modify the MM behavior by disbaling I/O during memory
>>>> allocation. This prevents allocation paths recursing back into the filesystem
>>>> without explicitly changing the flags for every allocation site. Yet, lockdep
>>>> not being aware of that is prone to showing false positives. Fix this
>>>> by teaching it that the presence of PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO flag mean we are not
>>>> going to issue any I/O
>>>
>>> I'm not up to date on the specific, but GFP_IO is separate from GFP_FS.
>>>
>>> And MEMALLOC_NOIO only clears GFP_IO but leaves GFP_FS set.
>>
>> static inline gfp_t memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_t flags)
>> {
>> if (unlikely(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO))
>> flags &= ~(__GFP_IO | __GFP_FS);
>> return flags;
>> }
>>
>
> Ah, so in the initial patch you referenced there was:
>
> +static inline gfp_t memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_t flags)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO))
> + flags &= ~__GFP_IO;
> + return flags;
> +}
>
> OK, so then this commit needs something like:
>
> Fixes: 934f3072c17c ("mm: clear __GFP_FS when PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO is set")
Agree.
I wonder why this didn't come up much sooner.