Re: mm: fault in __do_fault
From: Dmitry Vyukov
Date: Fri Mar 03 2017 - 02:43:20 EST
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The following program triggers GPF in __do_fault:
>> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/27345737fca18d92ef761e7fa08aec9b/raw/d99d02511d0bf9a8d6f6bd9c79d373a26924e974/gistfile1.txt
>
> Can you verify this fix:
Applied the patch on bots.
> From a65381bc86d2963713b6a9c4a73cded7dd184282 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:36:59 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] userfaultfd: shmem: __do_fault requires VM_FAULT_NOPAGE
>
> __do_fault assumes vmf->page has been initialized and is valid if
> VM_FAULT_NOPAGE is not returned by vma->vm_ops->fault(vma, vmf).
>
> handle_userfault() in turn should return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE if it doesn't
> return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS or VM_FAULT_RETRY (the other two
> possibilities).
>
> This VM_FAULT_NOPAGE case is only invoked when signal are pending and
> it didn't matter for anonymous memory before. It only started to
> matter since shmem was introduced. hugetlbfs also takes a different
> path and doesn't exercise __do_fault.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> index fb6d02b..de28f43 100644
> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ int handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
> * in such case.
> */
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> - ret = 0;
> + ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> }
> }
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.