Hi Hans, Adrian,
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 18:23:56 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Calling acpi_device_fix_up_power() on a device which is not present
is not a good idea.
How bad is it?
This was introduced by commit e5bbf30733f9, which was backported to
several stable branches. If it causes real trouble then this fix-up
patch should be annotated with
Fixes: e5bbf30733f9 ("mmc: sdhci-acpi: Ensure connected devices are powered when")
and Cc's to stable@, so it can be propagated to all affected trees.
While at it also call acpi_bus_get_status() on the children before
the status check to make sure that child->status contains valid data.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
index 96465ff..873beae 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
@@ -394,15 +394,15 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
return -ENODEV;
+ if (acpi_bus_get_status(device) || !device->status.present)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
/* Power on the SDHCI controller and its children */
acpi_device_fix_up_power(device);
list_for_each_entry(child, &device->children, node)
if (child->status.present && child->status.enabled)
acpi_device_fix_up_power(child);
- if (acpi_bus_get_status(device) || !device->status.present)
- return -ENODEV;
-
if (sdhci_acpi_byt_defer(dev))
return -EPROBE_DEFER;