Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes

[Jonathan Cameron]

On 3 March 2017 16:52:47 GMT+00:00, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Jonathan, Wolfram, do you have any preferences on how this should be
>> coordinated regarding the new iio and i2c drivers (and iio changes)?
>
>You got the acks, all is fine, I think.
>
>> My plan is to at some point declare the branch immutable. Then both
>of
>> you can pull it in. Or? 
>
>Yup, sounds good.
>
>> But now that I think about it I wonder what the point is of having
>> Greg pull it in also? Sure, third time's a charm and all that, but...
>
>AFAIU, Greg will be your "upstream", so he should definately pull the
>branch. I will just pull it in to avoid merge conflicts in my tree.
>Or did I misunderstand your question?
Agreed, will do the same if needed. Btw Greg is a very nice upstream to have!

Jonathan

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.