Re: [GIT PULL] sched.h split-up

[Ingo Molnar]

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Anyway, I fixed the semantic merge error by just including thar
> <linux/sched/signal.h> file, but this is just not acceptable.
> 
> Having to have files know that if they use the wait-event functins
> (well, _some_ of them), they not only need to include <linux/wait.h>,
> they need to completely illogically also include
> <linux/sched/signal.h> is just not maintainable.

Absolutely and agreed, will fix this ASAP!

wait.h generates too large functions anyway, so uninlining parts of it will be an 
improvement anyway.

> And who knows what similar semantic cases I _won't_ notice, because
> they occur in code I don't build even with my allmodconfig builds?

I did a fair amount of allyes/allno/allmod plus randconfig testing on x86, and 
caught and fixed a number of cases, so that angle should be covered to a fair 
degree.

On non-x86 I did allyes/allno/allmod testing as well, but not randconfig testing - 
plus some of the architectures have a large amount of defconfigs which I couldn't 
all test through.

So I'd expect build breakages to be concentrated into newly upstreamed code (such 
as this one) - which risk I tried to reduce by re-testing them on the almost-last 
day of the merge window.

Thanks,

	Ingo