On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Christian KÃnig <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Sorry, looked like both Alex and I missed your patch. But yes that the PCI subsystem prints that info anyway is a good argument.
From: Christian KÃnig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
The address is 64bit, not 32bit.
Signed-off-by: Christian KÃnig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index bf31aaf..a470869 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int amdgpu_doorbell_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
if (adev->doorbell.ptr == NULL) {
return -ENOMEM;
}
- DRM_INFO("doorbell mmio base: 0x%08X\n", (uint32_t)adev->doorbell.base);It seems I sent patch to remove those at all, but if you wish to leave
+ DRM_INFO("doorbell mmio base: 0x%llX\n", (uint64_t)adev->doorbell.base);
DRM_INFO("doorbell mmio size: %u\n", (unsigned)adev->doorbell.size);
them, please convert to %pap and remove explicit casting.