Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings

From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue Mar 07 2017 - 07:02:33 EST

Next message: Dilger, Andreas: "Re: [PATCH 5/5] staging: lustre: osc_page.c: Use list_for_each_entry_safe"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 10:01 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> To me a lexical 'true/false' instead of '1/0' is a step backwards in readability
> in many cases

What cases are those to you?

I can't think of any case where 1/0 for true/false
is "more readable" for boolean returns to me.

Next message: Dilger, Andreas: "Re: [PATCH 5/5] staging: lustre: osc_page.c: Use list_for_each_entry_safe"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]