Re: [PATCH] mm: move pcp and lru-pcp drainging into single wq
From: Tetsuo Handa
Date: Tue Mar 07 2017 - 09:47:58 EST
Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>
> We currently have 2 specific WQ_RECLAIM workqueues in the mm code.
> vmstat_wq for updating pcp stats and lru_add_drain_wq dedicated to drain
> per cpu lru caches. This seems more than necessary because both can run
> on a single WQ. Both do not block on locks requiring a memory allocation
> nor perform any allocations themselves. We will save one rescuer thread
> this way.
>
> On the other hand drain_all_pages() queues work on the system wq which
> doesn't have rescuer and so this depend on memory allocation (when all
> workers are stuck allocating and new ones cannot be created). This is
> not critical as there should be somebody invoking the OOM killer (e.g.
> the forking worker) and get the situation unstuck and eventually
> performs the draining. Quite annoying though. This worker should be
> using WQ_RECLAIM as well. We can reuse the same one as for lru draining
> and vmstat.
Is "there should be somebody invoking the OOM killer" really true?
According to http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201703031948.CHJ81278.VOHSFFFOOLJQMt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
kthreadd (PID = 2) is trying to allocate "struct task_struct" requested by
workqueue managers (PID = 19, 157, 10499) but is blocked on memory allocation.
__GFP_FS allocations could get stuck waiting for drain_all_pages() ?
Also, order > 0 allocation request by the forking worker could get stuck
at too_many_isolated() in mm/compaction.c ?
>
> Changes since v1
> - rename vmstat_wq to mm_percpu_wq - per Mel
> - make sure we are not trying to enqueue anything while the WQ hasn't
> been intialized yet. This shouldn't happen because the initialization
> is done from an init code but some init section might be triggering
> those paths indirectly so just warn and skip the draining in that case
> per Vlastimil
> - do not propagate error from setup_vmstat to keep the previous behavior
> per Mel
>
> Suggested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Hi,
> this has been previous posted [1] as an RFC. There was no fundamental
> opposition and some minor comments are addressed in this patch I
> believe.
>
> To remind the original motivation, Tetsuo has noted that drain_all_pages
> doesn't use WQ_RECLAIM [1] and asked whether we can move the worker to
> the vmstat_wq which is WQ_RECLAIM. I think the deadlock he has described
> shouldn't happen but it would be really better to have the rescuer. I
> also think that we do not really need 2 or more workqueues and also pull
> lru draining in.
>
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170207210908.530-1-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> mm/internal.h | 7 +++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> mm/swap.c | 27 ++++++++-------------------
> mm/vmstat.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 823a7a89099b..04d08ef91224 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -486,6 +486,13 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
> enum ttu_flags;
> struct tlbflush_unmap_batch;
>
> +
> +/*
> + * only for MM internal work items which do not depend on
> + * any allocations or locks which might depend on allocations
> + */
> +extern struct workqueue_struct *mm_percpu_wq;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH
> void try_to_unmap_flush(void);
> void try_to_unmap_flush_dirty(void);
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 1c72dd91c82e..1aa5729c8f98 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2362,6 +2362,13 @@ void drain_all_pages(struct zone *zone)
> */
> static cpumask_t cpus_with_pcps;
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure nobody triggers this path before mm_percpu_wq is fully
> + * initialized.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mm_percpu_wq))
> + return;
> +
> /* Workqueues cannot recurse */
> if (current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
> return;
> @@ -2411,7 +2418,7 @@ void drain_all_pages(struct zone *zone)
> for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_with_pcps) {
> struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_drain, cpu);
> INIT_WORK(work, drain_local_pages_wq);
> - schedule_work_on(cpu, work);
> + queue_work_on(cpu, mm_percpu_wq, work);
> }
> for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_with_pcps)
> flush_work(per_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_drain, cpu));
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index ac98eb443a03..361bdb1575ab 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -677,30 +677,19 @@ static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, lru_add_drain_work);
>
> -/*
> - * lru_add_drain_wq is used to do lru_add_drain_all() from a WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
> - * workqueue, aiding in getting memory freed.
> - */
> -static struct workqueue_struct *lru_add_drain_wq;
> -
> -static int __init lru_init(void)
> -{
> - lru_add_drain_wq = alloc_workqueue("lru-add-drain", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> -
> - if (WARN(!lru_add_drain_wq,
> - "Failed to create workqueue lru_add_drain_wq"))
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -early_initcall(lru_init);
> -
> void lru_add_drain_all(void)
> {
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
> static struct cpumask has_work;
> int cpu;
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure nobody triggers this path before mm_percpu_wq is fully
> + * initialized.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON(!mm_percpu_wq))
> + return;
> +
> mutex_lock(&lock);
> get_online_cpus();
> cpumask_clear(&has_work);
> @@ -714,7 +703,7 @@ void lru_add_drain_all(void)
> pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_lazyfree_pvecs, cpu)) ||
> need_activate_page_drain(cpu)) {
> INIT_WORK(work, lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
> - queue_work_on(cpu, lru_add_drain_wq, work);
> + queue_work_on(cpu, mm_percpu_wq, work);
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &has_work);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> index 9557fc0f36a4..ff9c49c47f32 100644
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -1563,7 +1563,6 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_vmstat_file_operations = {
> #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -static struct workqueue_struct *vmstat_wq;
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct delayed_work, vmstat_work);
> int sysctl_stat_interval __read_mostly = HZ;
>
> @@ -1621,7 +1620,7 @@ static void vmstat_update(struct work_struct *w)
> * to occur in the future. Keep on running the
> * update worker thread.
> */
> - queue_delayed_work_on(smp_processor_id(), vmstat_wq,
> + queue_delayed_work_on(smp_processor_id(), mm_percpu_wq,
> this_cpu_ptr(&vmstat_work),
> round_jiffies_relative(sysctl_stat_interval));
> }
> @@ -1700,7 +1699,7 @@ static void vmstat_shepherd(struct work_struct *w)
> struct delayed_work *dw = &per_cpu(vmstat_work, cpu);
>
> if (!delayed_work_pending(dw) && need_update(cpu))
> - queue_delayed_work_on(cpu, vmstat_wq, dw, 0);
> + queue_delayed_work_on(cpu, mm_percpu_wq, dw, 0);
> }
> put_online_cpus();
>
> @@ -1716,7 +1715,6 @@ static void __init start_shepherd_timer(void)
> INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(per_cpu_ptr(&vmstat_work, cpu),
> vmstat_update);
>
> - vmstat_wq = alloc_workqueue("vmstat", WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> schedule_delayed_work(&shepherd,
> round_jiffies_relative(sysctl_stat_interval));
> }
> @@ -1762,11 +1760,15 @@ static int vmstat_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
>
> #endif
>
> +struct workqueue_struct *mm_percpu_wq;
> +
> static int __init setup_vmstat(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - int ret;
> + int ret __maybe_unused;
>
> + mm_percpu_wq = alloc_workqueue("vmstat", WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_MM_VMSTAT_DEAD, "mm/vmstat:dead",
> NULL, vmstat_cpu_dead);
> if (ret < 0)
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>