Re: [PATCH 5/5] staging/lustre: Use generic range rwlock

[Davidlohr Bueso]

On Tue, 07 Mar 2017, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 12:03 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> > This replaces the in-house version, which is also derived
> > from Jan's interval tree implementation.
> >
> > Cc: oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: lustre-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > XXX: compile tested only. In house uses 'ulong long', generic uses 'ulong', is this a problem?
>
> Hm, cannot seem to find the other patches in this series anywhere to verify and my subscription to linux-kernel broke as it turns out.

You can find the full series here:

https://lwn.net/Articles/716383/

> You mean the range is ulong? So only can have this working up to 2G offsets on the
> 32bit systems and then wrap around?

Yes.

Thanks,
Davidlohr