Re: [PATCH] clock: Fix smp_processor_id() in preemptible bug
From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Thu Mar 09 2017 - 10:32:02 EST
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:24:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 01:53:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The v4.11-rc1 kernel emits the following splat in some configurations:
> >
> > [ 43.681891] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kworker/3:1/49
> > [ 43.682511] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
> > [ 43.682893] CPU: 0 PID: 49 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc1+ #1
> > [ 43.683382] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> > [ 43.683497] Workqueue: events __clear_sched_clock_stable
> > [ 43.683497] Call Trace:
> > [ 43.683497] dump_stack+0x4f/0x69
> > [ 43.683497] check_preemption_disabled+0xd9/0xf0
> > [ 43.683497] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
> > [ 43.683497] __clear_sched_clock_stable+0x11/0x60
> > [ 43.683497] process_one_work+0x146/0x430
> > [ 43.683497] worker_thread+0x126/0x490
> > [ 43.683497] kthread+0xfc/0x130
> > [ 43.683497] ? process_one_work+0x430/0x430
> > [ 43.683497] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
> > [ 43.683497] ? umh_complete+0x30/0x30
> > [ 43.683497] ? call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x12a/0x130
> > [ 43.683497] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40
> > [ 43.689244] sched_clock: Marking unstable (43688244724, 179505618)<-(43867750342, 0)
> >
> > This happens because workqueue handlers run with preemption enabled
> > by default and the new this_scd() function accesses per-CPU variables.
> > This commit therefore disables preemption across this call to this_scd()
> > and to the uses of the pointer that it returns. Lightly tested
> > successfully on x86.
>
> Does this also work?
Thank you! I will give it a shot after the other tests complete.
> ---
> kernel/sched/clock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> index a08795e21628..c63042253b65 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void clear_sched_clock_stable(void)
> smp_mb(); /* matches sched_clock_init_late() */
>
> if (sched_clock_running == 2)
> - schedule_work(&sched_clock_work);
> + schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &sched_clock_work);
> }
>
> void sched_clock_init_late(void)
>