On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:13:33PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
This is not how you check if running under a hypervisor; you should
check the HYPERVISOR bit, i.e. bit 31 of cpuid(1).ecx. This in turn
tells you if leaf 0x40000000 is valid.
Ah, good point, I already do that in the microcode loader :)
/*
* CPUID(1).ECX[31]: reserved for hypervisor use. This is still not
* completely accurate as xen pv guests don't see that CPUID bit set but
* that's good enough as they don't land on the BSP path anyway.
*/
if (native_cpuid_ecx(1) & BIT(31))
return *res;
That said, the main issue with this function is that it hardcodes the
behavior for KVM. It is possible that another hypervisor defines its
0x40000001 leaf in such a way that KVM_FEATURE_SEV has a different meaning.
Instead, AMD should define a "well-known" bit in its own space (i.e.
0x800000xx) that is only used by hypervisors that support SEV. This is
similar to how Intel defined one bit in leaf 1 to say "is leaf
0x40000000 valid".
+ if (eax > 0x40000000) {
+ eax = 0x40000001;
+ ecx = 0;
+ native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+ if (!(eax & BIT(KVM_FEATURE_SEV)))
+ goto out;
+
+ eax = 0x8000001f;
+ ecx = 0;
+ native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+ if (!(eax & 1))
Right, so this is testing CPUID_0x8000001f_ECX(0)[0], SME. Why not
simply set that bit for the guest too, in kvm?