Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] drm: bridge: dw-hdmi: Switch to V4L bus format and encodings
From: Jose Abreu
Date: Mon Mar 13 2017 - 07:44:31 EST
Hi Neil,
On 09-03-2017 14:27, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> On 08-03-2017 12:12, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi Jose,
>>
>> It seems here that we only have the RGB444<->YUV444 8bit tables, from the Amlogic
>> source I have the following for 10bit, 12bit and 16bit for itu601 :
>>
>> static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_out_eitu601_10b[3][4] = {
>> { 0x2000, 0x6926, 0x74fd, 0x043b },
>> { 0x2000, 0x2cdd, 0x0000, 0x7a65 },
>> { 0x2000, 0x0000, 0x38b4, 0x78ea }
>> };
>>
>> static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_out_eitu601_12b_16b[3][4] = {
>> { 0x2000, 0x6926, 0x74fd, 0x10ee },
>> { 0x2000, 0x2cdd, 0x0000, 0x6992 },
>> { 0x2000, 0x0000, 0x38b4, 0x63a6 }
>> };
> These two do not match anything I have here.
>
>> static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_in_eitu601_10b[3][4] = {
>> { 0x2591, 0x1322, 0x074b, 0x0000 },
>> { 0x6535, 0x2000, 0x7acc, 0x0800 },
>> { 0x6acd, 0x7534, 0x2000, 0x0800 }
>> };
> This is more or less correct, I have small offsets. Note that I
> even have offsets with the values that are in dw-hdmi driver,
> which can be caused because I'm seeing the latest document that
> contain these values. I guess they were updated.
>
>> static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_in_eitu601_12b_16b[3][4] = {
>> { 0x2591, 0x1322, 0x074b, 0x0000 },
>> { 0x6535, 0x2000, 0x7acc, 0x2000 },
>> { 0x6acd, 0x7534, 0x2000, 0x2000 }
>> };
> The same for this.
>
>> But I miss the itu709 values.
>>
>> Could you confirm these values and maybe provide the itu709 values ?
> I will have to check if I can provide you the values. I will get
> back to you.
Sorry but looks like I won't be able to provide you the correct
values :/ If you are working for a Synopsys customer you can
contact our CAE (If so I can guide you to the correct CAE).
Anyway, unless you can test the values you have I suggest you
don't use them, they do not match what I have here and I can't
test them because right now I don't have a setup (I'm assuming
that your CSC block within the controller was not modified).
Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu