Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...snip....
/////disconnect cable
can0 20000088 [8] 00 00 00 19 00 00 28 00 ERRORFRAME
protocol-violation{{}{acknowledge-slot}}
bus-error
error-counter-tx-rx{{40}{0}}
can0 20000088 [8] 00 00 00 19 00 00 58 00 ERRORFRAME
protocol-violation{{}{acknowledge-slot}}
bus-error
error-counter-tx-rx{{88}{0}}
can0 20000088 [8] 00 00 00 19 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME
protocol-violation{{}{acknowledge-slot}}
bus-error
error-counter-tx-rx{{128}{0}}
TX error warning is missing.
This support was missing in the driver, added in V4 patch.
can0 2000008C [8] 00 20 00 19 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME
controller-problem{tx-error-passive}
protocol-violation{{}{acknowledge-slot}}
bus-error
error-counter-tx-rx{{128}{0}}
Here "tx-error-passiv" is packed with a bus error. What I'm looking for are
state change messages similar to:
can0 20000204 [8] 00 08 00 00 00 00 60 00 ERRORFRAME
controller-problem{tx-error-warning}
state-change{tx-error-warning}
error-counter-tx-rx{{96}{0}}
can0 20000204 [8] 00 30 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME
controller-problem{tx-error-passive}
state-change{tx-error-passive}
error-counter-tx-rx{{128}{0}
They should always come, even with "berr-reporting off".
HI-3110 has only 1 bus error interrupt. There is no dedicated state
change interrupts like other controllers.
So here is my plan:
- Have the bus error interrupt always enabled
- If berr-reporting off, then have the isr checks/reports state changes
- if berr-reporting on, then have the isr checks/reports bus errors
and state changes (Does it make sense packing the error message, if
the ISR finds both bus and state changes?)
write: No buffer space available
root@imx6qrom5420b1:~# ip -s -d link show can0
4: can0: <NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP,ECHO> mtu 16 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN
mode DEFAULT group default qlen 10
link/can promiscuity 0
can <BERR-REPORTING> state ERROR-PASSIVE (berr-counter tx 128 rx 0)
restart-ms 0
bitrate 1000000 sample-point 0.750
tq 62 prop-seg 5 phase-seg1 6 phase-seg2 4 sjw 1
hi3110: tseg1 2..16 tseg2 2..8 sjw 1..4 brp 1..64 brp-inc 1
clock 16000000
re-started bus-errors arbit-lost error-warn error-pass bus-off
0 6 0 1 1 0
The error warning and passive counter increased , though. Also the bus error
should come in at a rather hight rate. Looking to the code, maybe
you need to test STATF to check for state changes (and not ERR).
Apologize, just realized In the above case some error packets were
lost, because I forgot to set the CPU frequency to max. Will resend
the log.
..snip...
After some more messages there should be also:
can0 20000200 [8] 00 40 00 00 00 00 5F 00 ERRORFRAME
state-change{back-to-error-active}
error-counter-tx-rx{{95}{0}}
For each message sent, the error counter decreases by 8.
The HI-3110 controller decrements the error counter by 1 for every message sent.
The error count increments by 8 when there is an error.
root@imx6qrom5420b1:~# ip -s -d link show can0
4: can0: <NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP,ECHO> mtu 16 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN
mode DEFAULT group default qlen 10
link/can promiscuity 0
can state ERROR-ACTIVE (berr-counter tx 117 rx 0) restart-ms 0
bitrate 1000000 sample-point 0.750
tq 62 prop-seg 5 phase-seg1 6 phase-seg2 4 sjw 1
hi3110: tseg1 2..16 tseg2 2..8 sjw 1..4 brp 1..64 brp-inc 1
clock 16000000
re-started bus-errors arbit-lost error-warn error-pass bus-off
0 1 0 0 0 0
Strange, some counters got lost.
This was a bug introduced when adding berr-reporting, have fixed in v4 patch.
I have not been able to check the bus-off condition by (short-circuiting
CAN low and high). The tec error count remains at 128 when I short the
CAN low and high pins and the status never goes BUSOFF.
You also need to send a message and the short-circuit should be at the
connector of the sending host. What tranceiver is used? Do you know?
ADM3054 transceiver is used with HI-3111. I connected the
HI-3111/ADM3054 board to kvaser leaf and ran "cangen -i can0" and
"candump -e any,0:0,#FFFFFFF" on the board. Removed the cable and
shorted the CAN_H/L pins coming out of ADM3054. I will try your
suggestion of using a different bit-rate on the Kvaser leaf instead.
I appreciate your continued feedback, it has helped significantly
improve the error handling of the driver. Looking back I should have
based it on sja1000 or flexcan driver.