Re: GFS2: pull request for high-priority bug

From: Bob Peterson
Date: Wed Mar 15 2017 - 13:41:57 EST


----- Original Message -----
| On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >
| > Andreas Gruenbacher (1):
| > gfs2: Avoid alignment hole in struct lm_lockname
|
| So I've pulled this because I think it fixes a real bug, but honestly
| I think it's the wrong fix.
|
| Marking that lm_lockname structure "packed, aligned(4)" means that the
| compiler will now think that the 64-bit fields in it may be unaligned
| - including on architectures where that can be very expensive and the
| compiler now might generate stupid unaligned instruction sequences to
| load those values.
|
| So the *correct* fix, I think, would have been:
|
| - add a comment about not having holes in the struct due to the hashing
|
| - sort the fields by size (so "ln_number" first, then "ln_sbd", then
| "ln_type")
|
| - use offsetofend(struct lm_lockname, ln_type) instead of sizeof() when
| hashing
|
| which avoids the "possibly generate garbage code" issue due to the
| quick-and-dirty one-liner approach.
|
| Hmm?
|
| Linus

Hi Linus,

Thanks. Yes, good ideas.
I see your point and I'll see if we can get that fixed up for the next merge window.

Bob Peterson