[net-next PATCH 1/2] net: Busy polling should ignore sender CPUs

From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Mon Mar 20 2017 - 17:49:30 EST


From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch is a cleanup/fix for NAPI IDs following the changes that made it
so that sender_cpu and napi_id were doing a better job of sharing the same
location in the sk_buff.

One issue I found is that we weren't validating the napi_id as being valid
before we started trying to setup the busy polling. This change corrects
that by using the MIN_NAPI_ID value that is now used in both allocating the
NAPI IDs, as well as validating them.

Fixes: 52bd2d62ce675 ("net: better skb->sender_cpu and skb->napi_id cohabitation")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/net/busy_poll.h | 11 +++++++++--
net/core/dev.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index c0452de83086..edf1310212a1 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@
extern unsigned int sysctl_net_busy_read __read_mostly;
extern unsigned int sysctl_net_busy_poll __read_mostly;

+/* 0 - Reserved to indicate value not set
+ * 1..NR_CPUS - Reserved for sender_cpu
+ * NR_CPUS+1..~0 - Region available for NAPI IDs
+ */
+#define MIN_NAPI_ID ((unsigned int)(NR_CPUS + 1))
+
static inline bool net_busy_loop_on(void)
{
return sysctl_net_busy_poll;
@@ -58,10 +64,11 @@ static inline unsigned long busy_loop_end_time(void)

static inline bool sk_can_busy_loop(const struct sock *sk)
{
- return sk->sk_ll_usec && sk->sk_napi_id && !signal_pending(current);
+ return sk->sk_ll_usec &&
+ (sk->sk_napi_id >= MIN_NAPI_ID) &&
+ !signal_pending(current);
}

-
static inline bool busy_loop_timeout(unsigned long end_time)
{
unsigned long now = busy_loop_us_clock();
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 7869ae3837ca..5bbe30c08a5b 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5143,10 +5143,10 @@ static void napi_hash_add(struct napi_struct *napi)

spin_lock(&napi_hash_lock);

- /* 0..NR_CPUS+1 range is reserved for sender_cpu use */
+ /* 0..NR_CPUS range is reserved for sender_cpu use */
do {
- if (unlikely(++napi_gen_id < NR_CPUS + 1))
- napi_gen_id = NR_CPUS + 1;
+ if (unlikely(++napi_gen_id < MIN_NAPI_ID))
+ napi_gen_id = MIN_NAPI_ID;
} while (napi_by_id(napi_gen_id));
napi->napi_id = napi_gen_id;