Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 0/2] IIO coding tasks

[Jonathan Cameron]

On 21 March 2017 17:27:02 GMT+00:00, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Alison Schofield
><amsfield22@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>       On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:39:38PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>       >
>>       >
>>       > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>>       >
>>       > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Alison Schofield
>>       <amsfield22@xxxxxxxxx>
>>       > > wrote:
>>       > >Â Â Â ÂOn Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:00:17PM +0530, Arushi
>>       Singhal wrote:
>>       > >Â Â Â Â> Patchseries of IIO coding tasks
>>       > >
>>       > >   ÂThis wouldn't be a patchset. Although they touch the
>>       same
>>       > >   Âdriver, the changes are unrelated. See more below...
>>       > >
>>       > > This I have send as a Patchset because as you have
>mentioned
>>       below that the
>>       > > [PATCH 2/2] was already done before by someone but I think
>>       so it is not yet
>>       > > applied in the Greg's tree yet.So I have done both the
>>       changes and as they
>>       > > should be applied one after other so that's why I have send
>>       them as
>>       > > Patchset.
>>       >
>>       > For the IIO patches, it is better to work on the IIO tree,
>not
>>       Greg's.
>>       > Greg manages staging, not IIO. The IIO patches should appear
>>       in Greg's
>>       > tree eventually.
>>       >
>>       > julia
>>
>>       We didn't direct applicants to create an iio tree. At this
>>       point,
>>       it seems more than is necessary. They can follow the
>directions
>>       in the
>>       task descriptions and avoid the collisions.
>>
>>       Of course, they are welcome to create a tree to iio/testing.
>>
>>       (IMHO it's more overhead/busy work and maybe not the best use
>>       of time in the home stretch of the application period.)
>>
>>       alisons
>>
>>
>> Hi Alison
>> As you have mentioned that my [PATCH 2/2] is already being done
>someone. So
>> how can I make the changes of [PATCH 1/2] on top of it as [PATCH 2/2]
>is not
>> yet applied on the staging tree.
>
>Make a patch that applies to the current state of the IIO tree.  Just
>clone that one like you cloned the staging one.
>
>julia
>
Slight amendment,. Normally would be the togreg branch which doesn't rebase.

With all the current churn might be best to use the testing branch and i will fix up any issues if i
 have to rebase as result of build tests.

Will.send Greg a pull later anyway, so should be less difference after he pulls that.

J
>> Please suggest me.
>> Thanks
>> Arushi
>>       >
>>       > >Â Â Â Â>
>>       > >Â Â Â Â> Arushi Singhal (2):
>>       > >Â Â Â Â>Â Âstaging: ad7759: Replace mlock with driver
>private
>>       lock
>>       > >
>>       > >   ÂThis one is already been submitted. If you have a v2
>>       for it,
>>       > >Â Â Â Âthen v2
>>       > >Â Â Â Âthe original patch.
>>       > >
>>       > > Is it submitted by me only before? And this is not the v2.
>>       > > I have just resed it.
>>       > >Â Â Â Â>Â Âstaging: iio: ade7759: Move header content to
>>       implementation
>>       > >Â Â Â Âfile
>>       > >
>>       > >   ÂThis patch is done and applied already. See the
>>       Coding Task #1
>>       > >Â Â Â Ânotes
>>       > >Â Â Â Âin the IIO Tasks page.
>>       > >
>>       > > Not at applied I think so.
>>       > > Thanks
>>       > > Arushi
>>       > >
>>       > >Â Â Â Âalisons
>>       > >
>>       > >Â Â Â Â>
>>       > >   Â> drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7759.c Â| 56
>>       > >Â Â Â Â+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>       > >   Â> drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7759.h Â| 53
>>       > >Â Â Â Â---------------------------------
>>       > >Â Â Â Â>Â 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>       > >Â Â Â Â>
>>       > >Â Â Â Â> --
>>       > >Â Â Â Â> 2.11.0
>>       > >Â Â Â Â>
>>       > > > --
>>       > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>       the Google
>>       > > Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
>>       > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>       from it,
>>       > > send an email to
>>       outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>       > > > To post to this group, send email to
>>       > > outreachy-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>       > > > To view this discussion on the
>webvisithttps://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20170321133021.6737
>>       -1-ar
>>       > > ushisinghal19971997%40gmail.com.
>>       > > > For more options, visit
>>       https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>       > >
>>       > >
>>       > > --
>>       > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>       Google Groups
>>       > > "outreachy-kernel" group.
>>       > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>       from it, send an
>>       > > email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>       > > To post to this group, send email to
>>       outreachy-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>       > > To view this discussion on the
>webvisithttps://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/CA%2BXqjF9dVy33Dsv0
>>       H2z8x
>>       > > taNeMOW7SQgr4qa4wLwz6xFNVTsUA%40mail.gmail.com.
>>       > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>       > >
>>       > >
>>
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.