Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111

[Eric Anholt]

Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:36:14PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> +static struct amba_driver pl111_amba_driver = {
>> +	.drv = {
>> +		.name = "clcd-pl11x",
>
> either:
>
> 		.name = "clcd-pl111",
>
> or:
>
> 		.name = "drm-clcd-pl111",
>
> otherwise the driver names will clash in sysfs - driver names must be
> unique.
>
>> +	},
>> +	.probe = pl111_amba_probe,
>> +	.remove = pl111_amba_remove,
>> +	.id_table = pl111_id_table,
>> +};
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>> +
>> +module_amba_driver(pl111_amba_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC);
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("ARM Ltd.");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pl111_drm");
>
> Does the platform alias make sense for an OF-only driver?

Not sure, this is left over from the original submission.

If I renamed to drm-clcd-pl111 and dropped the alias, would that get
your ack?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature