Re: [PATCH v1] Revert "extcon: usb-gpio: add support for ACPI gpio interface"

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi,

On 2017ë 03ì 22ì 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It seems
> a confusion with extcon-intel-int3496 which does support ACPI-enabled
> platforms.

Only for the reason that there is no any usecase until now,
and remove the confusion between extcon-usb-gpio and extcon-intel-int3496.
Should we revert it? 

I think that both extcon-usb-gpio and extcon-intel-int3496
driver are not same operation perfectly. Also, the filename
of extcon-intel-int3496 has specific name. Instead, extcon-usb-gpio.c
is more common device driver.

Can the extcon-intel-int3496.c support the everything on acpi side?

> 
> Revert commit 942c7924a51e to avoid any confusion in the future.
> 
> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> index d47573a31e17..9c925b05b7aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>  
>  #define USB_GPIO_DEBOUNCE_MS	20	/* ms */
> @@ -111,7 +110,7 @@ static int usb_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct usb_extcon_info *info;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!np && !ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
> +	if (!np)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics