Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] i2c: designware: introducing I2C_SLAVE definitions

[Jarkko Nikula]

On 03/20/17 13:10, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> - Definitions were added to core library
> - A example was added to designware-core.txt Documentation that shows
>   how the slave can be setup using DTS
>
> SLAVE related definitions were added to the core of the controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Oliveira <lolivei@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v6-v7
> - no changes
...
> +#define DW_IC_RX_ABRT_SLAVE_RD_INTX	(1UL << ABRT_SLAVE_RD_INTX)
> +#define DW_IC_RX_ABRT_SLAVE_ARBLOST	(1UL << ABRT_SLAVE_ARBLOST)
> +#define DW_IC_RX_ABRT_SLAVE_FLUSH_TXFIFO	(1UL << ABRT_SLAVE_FLUSH_TXFIFO)
>
>  #define DW_IC_TX_ABRT_NOACK		(DW_IC_TX_ABRT_7B_ADDR_NOACK | \
>  					 DW_IC_TX_ABRT_10ADDR1_NOACK | \
> @@ -211,6 +236,7 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
>  	struct completion	cmd_complete;
>  	struct clk		*clk;
>  	struct reset_control	*rst;
> +	struct i2c_client		*slave;
>  	u32			(*get_clk_rate_khz) (struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
>  	struct dw_pci_controller *controller;
>  	int			cmd_err;
> @@ -230,6 +256,7 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
>  	struct i2c_adapter	adapter;
>  	u32			functionality;
>  	u32			master_cfg;
> +	u32			slave_cfg;
>  	unsigned int		tx_fifo_depth;
>  	unsigned int		rx_fifo_depth;
>  	int			rx_outstanding;
Here too I take my ack back. You should add comments for these added 
members.

--
Jarkko