Re: [PATCH linux-next] tty: Disable default console blanking interval

[Adam Borowski]

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:50:32AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869017
> 
> I'm not particularly knowledgable about console issues. Is a blaknking interval
> relevant in a post CRT world ? The argument in the bug description seems
> compelling.

I have no direct knowledge about screen burn-in, but a quick search shows
that, while not as prevalent as in the CRT days, it's still an issue:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_burn-in
https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=lcd%20screen%20burn-in

> -static int blankinterval = 10*60;
> +static int blankinterval;

Thus, the current default might be safer: an even all-black image will keep
the display readable as there won't be any localized artefacts.  On the
other hand, the photos I see are nowhere as bad as it was the case on CRTs,
so this reason might be dismissed.


There is another concern, though: light pollution.  A white image makes the
room bright enough to read by.  Don't laugh but 20 years ago in the dorm I
used to print \e[37;47;1m then 2000 'X'es to the screen to do things[1] (the
overhead light would wake up the roommates).  That was a CRT, LCDs are
brighter.  Obviously, lightgrey text on a black background producess less
light than all-white, but a regular monitor probably still gives off a total
amount of light similar to that of an all-white smartphone.

I'm not sure how many non-X screens are placed in rooms where someone tries
to sleep, but it's not something to ignore entirely.


I'm not arguing a hard "no", but you should at least think of the above two
concerns.


[1]. Not reading obviously, I am not _that_ insane. :Ã
-- 
âââââââ Meow!
âââââââ
âââââââ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or second
âââââââ preimage for double rot13!