Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: hw_random - Add new Exynos RNG driver
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Mar 24 2017 - 12:20:07 EST
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:11:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday, March 24, 2017 06:46:00 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > I really do not like global or file-scope variables. I do not like
> > drivers using them. Actually I hate them.
> >
> > From time to time I encounter a driver which was designed with that
> > approach - static fields and hidden assumption that there will be only
> > one instance. Usually that assumption is really hidden...
> >
> > ... and then it happens that I want to use two instances which of course
> > fails.
> >
> > This code serves as a clear documentation for this assumption - only one
> > instance is allowed. You can look at it as a self-documenting
> > requirement.
>
> For me it looks as needless case of defensive programming and when
> I see the code like this it always raises questions about the real
> intentions of the code. I find it puzzling and not helpful.
I do not understand what might be puzzling about check for static
file-scope value. It is of course subjective, but for me that looks
pretty self-explanatory.
>
> > And I think the probe might be called twice, for example in case of
> > mistake in DTB.
>
> Even if this is possible resource allocation code in the driver will
> take take care of handling it just fine,
Indeed, the devm_ioremap_resource() solves the case. I can drop the
check then.
Best regards,
Krzysztof