Re: [PATCH v9] staging: iio: adis16060: Remove iio_dev mlock and refactor code

From: SIMRAN SINGHAL
Date: Sat Mar 25 2017 - 14:21:14 EST


On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23/03/17 09:20, simran singhal wrote:
>> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
>> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
>> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
>>
>> In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware state changes.
>>
>> In the driver, buf_lock protects both the adis16060_spi_write() and
>> adis16060_spi_read() functions and both are always called in pair.
>> First write, then read. Refactor the code to have one single function
>> adis16060_spi_write_then_read() protected by the buf_lock. This removes
>> the need for additional locking via mlock, so this locking is removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@xxxxxxxxx>
> Unfortunately I've now pushed out v8 as togreg which is a non rebasing tree.
> As such, could you post a separate patch, on top of that making the
> than -> then change?
>

ok, I will send the patch with than-> then change.

> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>> ---
>>
>> v9:
>> -Change the name of function from adis16060_spi_write_than_read()
>> to adis16060_spi_write_then_read(). change "than" to "then" as
>> its time depended.
>> -Add mutex_unlock
> As Alison keeps mentioning, ideal is to keep all previous change logs
> here as it allows those who last looked at say v5 to know what changed
> in between without reading a lot of threads!
>>

Sorry, will not repeate this in future.

>> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c | 35 +++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
>> index c9d46e7..9675245 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
>> @@ -40,25 +40,20 @@ struct adis16060_state {
>>
>> static struct iio_dev *adis16060_iio_dev;
>>
>> -static int adis16060_spi_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u8 val)
>> +static int adis16060_spi_write_then_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> + u8 conf, u16 *val)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>
>> mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
>> - st->buf[2] = val; /* The last 8 bits clocked in are latched */
>> + st->buf[2] = conf; /* The last 8 bits clocked in are latched */
>> ret = spi_write(st->us_w, st->buf, 3);
>> - mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int adis16060_spi_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u16 *val)
>> -{
>> - int ret;
>> - struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> ret = spi_read(st->us_r, st->buf, 3);
>>
>> @@ -86,17 +81,11 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>
>> switch (mask) {
>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
>> - /* Take the iio_dev status lock */
>> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>> - ret = adis16060_spi_write(indio_dev, chan->address);
>> + ret = adis16060_spi_write_then_read(indio_dev,
>> + chan->address, &tval);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> - goto out_unlock;
>> + return ret;
>>
>> - ret = adis16060_spi_read(indio_dev, &tval);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - goto out_unlock;
>> -
>> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>> *val = tval;
>> return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
>> @@ -110,10 +99,6 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> }
>>
>> return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> -out_unlock:
>> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>> - return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static const struct iio_info adis16060_info = {
>>
>