Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] soc/imx: Add GPCv2 power gating driver
From: Andrey Smirnov
Date: Mon Mar 27 2017 - 14:49:54 EST
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Dong Aisheng <dongas86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:50:04AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> Add code allowing for control of various power domains managed by GPCv2
>> IP block found in i.MX7 series of SoCs. Power domains covered by this
>> patch are:
>>
>> - PCIE PHY
>> - MIPI PHY
>> - USB HSIC PHY
>> - USB OTG1/2 PHY
>>
>
> You probably may need drop USB OTG which is not claimed in current RM.
> See the PGC definition in 5.5.10 GPC Memory Map section.
>
> Each PGC (CPU type, MIX type, PU type) will occupy 64 Bytes address space,
> the specific base address of each PGC are listed as below.
> â 0x800 ~ 0x83F : PGC for A7 core0
> â 0x840 ~ 0x87F: PGC for A7 core1
> â 0x880 ~ 0x8BF: PGC for A7 SCU
> â 0xA00 ~ 0xA3F: PGC for fastmix/megamix
> â 0xC00 ~ 0xC3F: PGC for MIPI PHY
> â 0xC40 ~ 0xC7F: PGC for PCIE_PHY
> â 0xC80 ~ 0xCBF: Reserved
> â 0xCC0 ~ 0xCFF: Reserved
> â 0xD00 ~ 0xD3F: PGC for USB HSIC PHY
>
> And in 5.4 Power Management Unit (PMU) chapter,
> you will find the USB OTG phy power is directly supplied by
> VDD_USB_OTG1_3P3_IN/VDD_USB_OTG2_3P3_IN.
>
> http://www.nxp.com/assets/documents/data/en/reference-manuals/IMX7DRM.pdf
>
> I understand that there's also some USB OTG code exist in NXP internal
> tree, but that's legacy for early doc implementation and may be deprecated.
> so i assume it should be gone.
>
> Hopefully i will double confirm with our IC designer tomorrow.
>
USB OTG domains are absent from that list, true, but they are
mentioned all of the place further in that section in register map
documentation, which makes it difficult to tell which part of the
datasheet is not up to date.
I'm going to drop those power domains for now, since I don't have a
use-case for them and it would also allow me to get rid of the chunk
of code you thought was messy. However it would be nice to get an
updated version of RM where all of that is straightened out.
>> Support for any other power domain controlled by GPC is not present, and
>> can be added at some later point.
>>
>> Testing of this code was done against a PCIe driver.
>>
>> Cc: yurovsky@xxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Dong Aisheng <dongas86@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/soc/imx/Kconfig | 10 ++
>> drivers/soc/imx/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c | 365 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 377 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/imx/Kconfig
>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/Kconfig
>> index f09023f..8943543 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/Kconfig
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ menu "SOC (System On Chip) specific Drivers"
>>
>> source "drivers/soc/bcm/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig"
>> +source "drivers/soc/imx/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig"
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/imx/Kconfig
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..bc7f0ee0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/Kconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +menu "i.MX SoC drivers"
>> +
>> +config IMX7_PM_DOMAINS
>> + bool "i.MX7 PM domains"
>> + select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>> + depends on SOC_IMX7D || (COMPILE_TEST && OF)
>> + default y if SOC_IMX7D
>> +
>> +endmenu
>> +
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
>> index 35861f5..5b6e396 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
>> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>> obj-y += gpc.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_IMX7_PM_DOMAINS) += gpcv2.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c b/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..a27c5f8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,365 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright 2017 Impinj, Inc
>> + * Author: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + * Based on the code of analogus driver:
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2015-2017 Pengutronix, Lucas Stach <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
>> + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
>> + *
>> + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
>> + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/imx7-power.h>
>> +
>> +#define GPC_PGC_CPU_MAPPING 0xec
>> +#define USB_HSIC_PHY_A7_DOMAIN BIT(6)
>> +#define USB_OTG2_PHY_A7_DOMAIN BIT(5)
>> +#define USB_OTG1_PHY_A7_DOMAIN BIT(4)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_A7_DOMAIN BIT(3)
>> +#define MIPI_PHY_A7_DOMAIN BIT(2)
>> +
>> +#define GPC_PU_PGC_SW_PUP_REQ 0xf8
>> +#define GPC_PU_PGC_SW_PDN_REQ 0x104
>> +#define USB_HSIC_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(4)
>> +#define USB_OTG2_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(3)
>> +#define USB_OTG1_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(2)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(1)
>> +#define MIPI_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(0)
>> +
>
> After apply, what i see is:
> #define GPC_PU_PGC_SW_PUP_REQ 0xf8
> #define GPC_PU_PGC_SW_PDN_REQ 0x104
> #define USB_HSIC_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(4)
> #define USB_OTG2_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(3)
> #define USB_OTG1_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(2)
> #define PCIE_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(1)
> #define MIPI_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ BIT(0)
>
> Looks quite tight,
> Can we have one more TAB for the definition?
> Like:
> #define GPC_PU_PGC_SW_PUP_REQ 0xf8
>
Sure, will do.
>> +#define GPC_MAX_REGISTER 0x1000
>> +
>> +#define GPC_PGC_nCTRL_PCR BIT(0)
>> +
>> +struct imx7_pgc_domain {
>> + struct generic_pm_domain genpd;
>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>> + struct regulator *regulator;
>> +
>> + unsigned int pgc_nctrl;
>> +
>> + const struct {
>> + u32 pxx;
>> + u32 map;
>> + } bits;
>> +
>> + const int voltage;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int imx7_gpc_pu_pgc_sw_pxx_req(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>> + bool on)
>> +{
>> + struct imx7_pgc_domain *domain = container_of(genpd,
>> + struct imx7_pgc_domain,
>> + genpd);
>> + unsigned int offset = on ?
>> + GPC_PU_PGC_SW_PUP_REQ : GPC_PU_PGC_SW_PDN_REQ;
>> + const bool enable_power_control = domain->pgc_nctrl && !on;
>> + const bool has_regulator = !IS_ERR(domain->regulator);
>> + unsigned long deadline;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + regmap_update_bits(domain->regmap, GPC_PGC_CPU_MAPPING,
>> + domain->bits.map, domain->bits.map);
>> +
>> + if (has_regulator && on) {
>> + ret = regulator_enable(domain->regulator);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(domain->dev, "failed to enable regulator\n");
>> + goto unmap;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (enable_power_control)
>> + regmap_update_bits(domain->regmap, domain->pgc_nctrl,
>> + GPC_PGC_nCTRL_PCR, GPC_PGC_nCTRL_PCR);
>> +
>> + regmap_update_bits(domain->regmap, offset,
>> + domain->bits.pxx, domain->bits.pxx);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * As per "5.5.9.4 Example Code 4" in IMX7DRM.pdf wait
>> + * for PUP_REQ/PDN_REQ bit to be cleared
>> + */
>> + deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1);
>> + while (true) {
>> + u32 pxx_req;
>> +
>> + regmap_read(domain->regmap, offset, &pxx_req);
>> +
>> + if (!(pxx_req & domain->bits.pxx))
>> + break;
>> +
>> + if (time_after(jiffies, deadline)) {
>> + dev_err(domain->dev, "falied to command PGC\n");
>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + /*
>> + * If we were in a process of enabling a
>> + * domain and failed we might as well disable
>> + * the regulator we just enabled. And if it
>> + * was the opposite situation and we failed to
>> + * power down -- keep the regulator on
>> + */
>> + on = !on;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cpu_relax();
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (enable_power_control)
>> + regmap_update_bits(domain->regmap, domain->pgc_nctrl,
>> + GPC_PGC_nCTRL_PCR, 0);
>> +
>> + if (has_regulator && !on) {
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = regulator_disable(domain->regulator);
>> + if (err)
>> + dev_err(domain->dev,
>> + "failed to disable regulator: %d\n", ret);
>> + /* Preserve earlier error code */
>> + ret = ret ?: err;
>> + }
>> +unmap:
>> + regmap_update_bits(domain->regmap, GPC_PGC_CPU_MAPPING,
>> + domain->bits.map, 0);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx7_gpc_pu_pgc_sw_pup_req(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>> +{
>> + return imx7_gpc_pu_pgc_sw_pxx_req(genpd, true);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx7_gpc_pu_pgc_sw_pdn_req(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>> +{
>> + return imx7_gpc_pu_pgc_sw_pxx_req(genpd, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct imx7_pgc_domain imx7_pgc_domains[] = {
>> + [IMX7_POWER_DOMAIN_USB_HSIC_PHY] = {
>> + .genpd = {
>> + .name = "usb-hsic-phy",
>> + },
>> + .bits = {
>> + .pxx = USB_HSIC_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ,
>> + .map = USB_HSIC_PHY_A7_DOMAIN,
>> + },
>> + .voltage = 1200000,
>> + .pgc_nctrl = 0x0d00,
>> + },
>> +
>> + [IMX7_POWER_DOMAIN_USB_OTG2_PHY] = {
>> + .genpd = {
>> + .name = "usb-otg2-phy",
>> + },
>> + .bits = {
>> + .pxx = USB_OTG2_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ,
>> + .map = USB_OTG2_PHY_A7_DOMAIN,
>> + },
>> + },
>> +
>> + [IMX7_POWER_DOMAIN_USB_OTG1_PHY] = {
>> + .genpd = {
>> + .name = "usb-otg1-phy",
>> + },
>> + .bits = {
>> + .pxx = USB_OTG1_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ,
>> + .map = USB_OTG1_PHY_A7_DOMAIN,
>> + },
>> + },
>> +
>> + [IMX7_POWER_DOMAIN_PCIE_PHY] = {
>> + .genpd = {
>> + .name = "pcie-phy",
>> + },
>> + .bits = {
>> + .pxx = PCIE_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ,
>> + .map = PCIE_PHY_A7_DOMAIN,
>> + },
>> + .voltage = 1000000,
>> + .pgc_nctrl = 0x0c40,
>> + },
>> +
>> + [IMX7_POWER_DOMAIN_MIPI_PHY] = {
>> + .genpd = {
>> + .name = "mipi-phy",
>> + },
>> + .bits = {
>> + .pxx = MIPI_PHY_SW_Pxx_REQ,
>> + .map = MIPI_PHY_A7_DOMAIN,
>> + },
>> + .voltage = 1000000,
>> + .pgc_nctrl = 0x0c00,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int imx7_pgc_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct imx7_pgc_domain *domain = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + domain->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + ret = pm_genpd_init(&domain->genpd, NULL, true);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(domain->dev, "Failed to init power domain\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + domain->regulator = devm_regulator_get_optional(domain->dev, "power");
>> + if (IS_ERR(domain->regulator) &&
>> + PTR_ERR(domain->regulator) != -ENODEV) {
>> + dev_err(domain->dev, "Failed to get domain's regulator\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(domain->regulator);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(domain->regulator)) {
>> + if (!domain->voltage) {
>> + WARN(1, "No voltage configured for domain's regulator");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + regulator_set_voltage(domain->regulator,
>> + domain->voltage, domain->voltage);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_genpd_add_provider_simple(domain->dev->of_node,
>> + &domain->genpd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(domain->dev, "Failed to add genpd provider\n");
>> + pm_genpd_remove(&domain->genpd);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx7_pgc_domain_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct imx7_pgc_domain *domain = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> +
>> + of_genpd_del_provider(domain->dev->of_node);
>> + pm_genpd_remove(&domain->genpd);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct platform_device_id imx7_pgc_domain_id[] = {
>> + { "imx7-pgc-domain", },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver imx7_pgc_domain_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "imx7-pgc",
>> + },
>> + .probe = imx7_pgc_domain_probe,
>> + .remove = imx7_pgc_domain_remove,
>> + .id_table = imx7_pgc_domain_id,
>> +};
>> +builtin_platform_driver(imx7_pgc_domain_driver)
>
> Again, i have a fundamental question about this patch implementation
> that why we choose above way to register the power domain?
>
> I'm sorry that i did not know too much history.
> Would you guys please help share some information?
>
> Because AFAIK this way will register each domain as a power domain
> provider which is a bit violate the real HW and current power domain
> framework design. And it is a bit more complicated to use than before.
>
> IMHO i would rather prefer the old traditional and simpler way that one
> provider (GPC) supplies multiple domains (PCIE/MIPI/HSIC PHY domain)
> than this patch does.
>
> However, i might be wrong. Please help to clear.
>
>> +
>> +static int imx_gpcv2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + static const struct regmap_config regmap_config = {
>> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
>
> You could drop it as GPC does.
>
Yep, will remove.
>> + .reg_bits = 32,
>> + .val_bits = 32,
>> + .reg_stride = 4,
>> + .max_register = GPC_MAX_REGISTER,
>
> Do you need add some readable/writeable reg?
>
> There seems to be some reserved regs in your range.
> I can easily got the below crash:
>
> root@imx6ul7d:/sys/kernel/debug/regmap/303a0000.gpc# cat registers
> [ 54.985395] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1008) at 0xf08511c0
> [ 54.993166] pgd = ed02c000
> [ 54.995894] [f08511c0] *pgd=af00c811, *pte=303a0653, *ppte=303a0453
> [ 55.002215] Internal error: : 1008 [#1] SMP ARM
> [ 55.006756] Modules linked in:
> [ 55.009830] CPU: 0 PID: 750 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.11.0-rc1-00057-g2d60158-dirty #1169
> [ 55.017842] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX7 Dual (Device Tree)
> [ 55.023598] task: ee20ee40 task.stack: ed0f8000
> [ 55.028146] PC is at regmap_mmio_read32le+0x14/0x24
> [ 55.033035] LR is at regmap_mmio_read+0x40/0x60
> [ 55.037577] pc : [<c054f160>] lr : [<c054f348>] psr: 20070093
> [ 55.037577] sp : ed0f9dc8 ip : ed0f9dd8 fp : ed0f9dd4
> [ 55.049064] r10: ed160000 r9 : ef341000 r8 : ed0f9f80
> [ 55.054299] r7 : ed0f9e5c r6 : ed0f9e5c r5 : 000001c0 r4 : ef3bb900
> [ 55.060836] r3 : f0851000 r2 : ed0f9e5c r1 : f08511c0 r0 : ef3bb900
> [ 55.067374] Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none
> [ 55.074606] Control: 10c5387d Table: ad02c06a DAC: 00000051
> [ 55.080361] Process cat (pid: 750, stack limit = 0xed0f8210)
> ....
Good catch, thank you! I'll update the code to make sure this doesn't happen.
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov