Hi Maddy, Hemant, Anju,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:05:02PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
[..snip..]
+So, in the core case, we are ok as long as any cpu in the core is
+static void core_imc_change_cpu_context(int old_cpu, int new_cpu)
+{
+ if (!core_imc_pmu)
+ return;
+ perf_pmu_migrate_context(&core_imc_pmu->pmu, old_cpu, new_cpu);
+}
+
+
+static int ppc_core_imc_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* If a cpu for this core is already set, then, don't do anything */
+ ret = cpumask_any_and(&core_imc_cpumask,
+ cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
+ if (ret < nr_cpu_ids)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Else, set the cpu in the mask, and change the context */
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &core_imc_cpumask);
+ core_imc_change_cpu_context(-1, cpu);
present in the imc_cpumask. It need not have to be the smallest online
cpu in the core.
Can the same logic be applied to the earlier nest case ?
We can have a single function for cpu_offline and cpu_online which
implements these checks and sets the cpu bit if required.
ppc_entity_imc_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu, cpumask_t
entity_imc_mask,
entity_imc_change_cpu_context_fn)
{
.
.
.
}
static ppc_nest_imc_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
return ppc_entity_imc_cpu_offline(cpu, nest_imc_mask,
nest_imc_change_cpu_context);
}
And similar ones for core imc and thread imc.
Does this sound reasonable ?
+ return 0;--
+}
+
+static int ppc_core_imc_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ int target;
+ unsigned int ncpu;
+
+ /*
+ * clear this cpu out of the mask, if not present in the mask,
+ * don't bother doing anything.
+ */
+ if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &core_imc_cpumask))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Find any online cpu in that core except the current "cpu" */
+ ncpu = cpumask_any_but(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu), cpu);
+
+ if (ncpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
+ target = ncpu;
+ cpumask_set_cpu(target, &core_imc_cpumask);
+ } else
+ target = -1;
+
+ /* migrate the context */
+ core_imc_change_cpu_context(cpu, target);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
Thanks and Regards
gautham.